Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings

Michal Veselý,Yang Zhao,Marissa Vos,Wim Zeiler
2016-01-01
Abstract:Personalized conditioning systems represent one of promising solutions for two major problems in current indoor environment – high energy consumption and unsatisfactory thermal comfort. As personalized conditioning focuses on a small space around a single person, it can better and more effectively satisfy the individual needs for thermal comfort than a traditional HVAC system. Personalized conditioning systems that have been tested rely mostly on control by user interaction, i.e. the users have to decide on the level of cooling or heating. This can lead to decreased comfort or increased energy consumption due to incorrect use of the system. This paper presents a novel method of process control of personalized heating based on human thermophysiology. The new control method is compared with user interaction and fixed setting of personalized heating system consisting of heated chair and heated desk and floor mats. Different control strategies for personalized heating were tested with 13 human subjects in a climate chamber under operative temperature of 18 °C for 90 minutes. The test subjects evaluated their thermal comfort every 15 minutes via a computer based questionnaire. As skin temperature of the hands was previously identified as a good predictor of cool discomfort under uniform conditions, it was tested in this study as a control signal for personalized heating. Thermal comfort and energy use with personalized heating are compared in the results section. Personalized heating improved thermal comfort in all test cases. No significant difference was observed between user interaction, fixed setting, and automatic control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?