Abstract:We propose a model-free omnibus statistical procedure to check whether the direction of changes in an economic variable is predictable using the history of its past changes. A class of separate inference procedures are also given to gauge possible sources of directional predictability. They can reveal information about whether the direction of future changes is predictable using the direction, level, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis of past changes. An important feature of the proposed procedures is that they check many lags simultaneously, which is particularly suitable for detecting the alternatives whose directional dependence is small at each lag but it carries over a long distributional lag. At the same time, the tests naturally discount higher order lags, which is consistent with the conventional wisdom that financial markets are more influenced by the recent past events than by the remote past events. We apply the proposed procedures to four daily U.S. stock price indices. We find overwhelming evidence that the directions of excess stock returns are predictable using past excess stock returns, and the evidence is stronger for the directional predictability of large excess stock returns. In particular, the direction and level of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with any threshold, and the volatility, skewness and kurtosis of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with nonzero thresholds (i.e., large returns). The well-known strong volatility clustering together with weak serial dependence in mean cannot completely explain all documented directional predictability for stock returns. To exploit the economic significance of the documented directional predictability for stock returns, we consider a class of autologit models for directional forecasts and find that they have significant out-of-sample directional predictive power. Some trading strategies based on these models and their combinations can earn significant out-of-sample extra risk-adjusted returns over the buy-and-hold trading strategy.

Prospect Theory and Currency Returns ∗

Prospect Theory and Currency Returns: Empirical Evidence

Model-free evaluation of directional predictability in foreign exchange markets

Does Prospect Theory Explain Mutual Fund Performance? Evidence from China

Overreaction and underreaction to new information and the directional forecast of exchange rates

Geopolitical risk and currency returns

Prospect Theory for Online Financial Trading

Time-varying risk attitude and the foreign exchange market behavior

Foreign Exchange News and Currency Reversals

A Sentiment-Based Explanation of the Forward Premium Puzzle

Skewness Risk Premia and the Cross-Section of Currency Returns

Prospect Theory and the Risk-Return Tradeoff

Prospect Theory and Stock Market Anomalies

Speculation or currency? Multi-scale analysis of cryptocurrencies-The case of Bitcoin

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable ? Statistical Theory and Evidence

Prospect Theory and the Disposition Effect

Intertemporal Substitution, Precautionary Saving, and the Currency Premium

Can the Random Walk Model Be Beaten in Out-Of-Sample Density Forecasts? Evidence from Intraday Foreign Exchange Rates

A reconsideration of the failure of uncovered interest parity for the U.S. dollar

Can Prospect Theory Explain the Disposition Effect? A New Perspective on Reference Points

Do Foreign Exchange Risk Premiums Relate to the Volatility in the Foreign Exchange and Equity Markets?