Abstract:A number of studies have used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of the countries in Olympic games. While competition exists among the countries in Olympic games/rankings, all these DEA studies do not model competition among peer decision making units (DMUs) or countries. These DEA studies find a set of weights/multipliers that keep the efficiency scores of all DMUs at or below unity. Although cross efficiency goes a further step by providing an efficiency measure in terms of the best multiplier bundle for the unit and all the other DMUs, it is not always unique. This paper presents a new and modified DEA game cross-efficiency model where each DMU is viewed as a competitor via non-cooperative game. For each competing DMU, a multiplier bundle is determined that optimizes the efficiency score for that DMU, with the additional constraint that the resulting score should be at or above that DMU 's estimated best performance. The problem, of course, arises that we will not know this best performance score for the DMU under evaluation until the best performances of all other DMUs are known. To combat this “chicken and egg” phenomenon, an iterative approach leading to the Nash equilibrium is presented. The current paper provides a modified variable returns to scale (VRS) model that yields non-negative cross-efficiency scores. The approach is applied to the last six Summer Olympic Games. Our results may indicate that our game cross-efficiency model implicitly incorporates the relative importance of gold, silver and bronze medals without the need for specifying the exact assurance regions.

Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis

Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis.

Performance Evaluation of Two-Stage Network Structures with Fixed-Sum Outputs: an Application to the 2018winter Olympic Games

Measuring Olympics Achievements Based on A Parallel Dea Approach

Cross-efficiency Evaluation Approach to Olympic Ranking and Benchmarking: the Case of Beijing 2008

Achievement and Benchmarking of Countries at the Summer Olympics Using Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method.

Models for measuring and benchmarking olympics achievements

Performance and benchmarks of participating nations in Beijing Olympics using the DEA approach

DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Approach to Olympic Rankings

Olympics Ranking and Benchmarking Based on Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method and Cluster Analysis: the Case of Sydney 2000

Measuring the Performance of Nations at Beijing Summer Olympics Using Integer-Valued DEA Model

Weight assurance region in two-stage additive efficiency decomposition DEA model: an application to school data

A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis

An Olympic Prediction Approach Using Data Envelopment Analysis

Average lexicographic efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to China’s regional high-tech innovation systems

Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan

Research on the Olympics Achievement Rating and Ranking

A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

Development of a Bounded Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model in the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

Reconsidering Performance at the Summer Olympics and Revealed Comparative Advantage

Data Envelopment Analysis Efficiency In Two-Stage Networks With Feedback