Inequality Persistence and Revolution : What can we learn from the Long March in China ?

Li Shi

2011-01-01

Abstract:Are radical reforms able to tackle inequality persistence? We investigate the impact of one of the most radical changes one can think of, Mao’s revolution in rural China, on inequality persistence. We identify places which experienced reforms of different intensity for exogenous reasons, by using a unique historical event, the Long March of the Red Army in the mid 1930s, which was retreating to escape the Nationalists. The counties crossed by the Long March were not very different from their neighbouring counties, but they faced more radical changes from the late 1940s on. We focus on two important determinants shaping households opportunities : land endowment and education. First, we show that in the Long March counties, formerly poor families have now more land than others, and educational outcomes of children are independent of their grandfathers’. Second, we show that the the situation is different for the other counties. For most rural areas, the historical poverty of households is strongly correlated with less land nowadays. For most areas in rural China, the reform failed to disrupt the transmission of human capital. Overall, the persistence of inequality is remarkable. Radical reforms might be powerful in changing patterns of inequality persistence, but such impact is likely to be geographically limited to places where land reform or revolution are receiving increased attention and resources. JEL Classification: D63, P48, O13.