Education, Creativity and the Economy of Passions

Michael A Peters

2007-01-01

Abstract:The paper reviews claims for creativity in the econ omy and in education distinguishing two accounts: ‘personal anarcho-aesthetics’ and ‘th e design principle’. The first emerges in the psychological literature from sources in the Romantic Movement emphasizing the creative genius and the way in which creativity eme rges from deep subconscious processes, involves the imagination, is anchored in the passions, cannot be directed and is beyond the rational control of the individual. Thi s account has a close fit to business often as a form of ‘brainstorming’, ‘mind-mapping’ or ‘strategic planning’, and is closely associated with the figure of the risk-taking entre preneur. By contrast ‘the design principle’ is both relational and social and surfac es in related ideas of ‘social capital’, ‘situated learning’, and ‘P2P’ (peer-to-peer) accou nts of commons-based peer production. It is seen to be a product of social and networked environments—rich semiotic and intelligent environments in which everything speaks . This paper traces the genealogies of these two contrasting accounts of creativity and th eir significance for educational practice before showing how both notions are strongly connec ted in accounts of new forms of capitalism that require a rethinking of the notion of creativity and its place in schools and institutions of higher education. The paper begins by providing a context in terms of a history of the knowledge economy and the historical tendency toward aesthetic or designer capitalism.