Using Departments of Pathology And

Xiao-Song Wang,Sunita Shankar,S. Dhanasekaran,Bushra Ateeq,A. Sasaki,Xiaojun Jing,Daniel H. Robinson,Q. Cao,John R. Prensner,Anastasia K. Yocum,Rui Wang,Daniel F. Fries,B. Han,I. Asangani,Xuhong Cao,Yong Li,G. Omenn,D. Pflueger,A. Gopalan,V. Reuter,E. Kahoud,L. Cantley,M. Rubin,N. Palanisamy,S. Varambally,A. Chinnaiyan
2011-01-01
Abstract:intRoDuction To understand the characteristic features of driving gene fusions in cancer, we previously carried out a large-scale integrative analysis of cancer genomic datasets matched with gene rearrangement data (1). As part of this analysis, we observed that in many instances a small subset of tumors or cancer cell lines harboring an oncogenic gene fusion displays characteristic amplification at the site of genomic rearrangement (refs. 2–6; Supplementary Fig. S1A and B). Such amplifications usually affect a portion of the fusion gene and are generally considered secondary genetic lesions associated with disease progression, drug resistance, and poor prognosis (2, 4–8). In contrast, high-level copy number changes that result in the marked overexpression of oncogenes usually encompass the target genes at the center of overlapping amplifications across a panel of tumor samples. Thus, a “partially” amplified cancer gene may suggest that this gene participates ReseARcH BRieF JUNE 2011 CANCER DISCOVERY | 35 doi: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-10-0022 ©2011 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Research. on April 20, 2017. © 2011 American Association for cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from Published OnlineFirst April 3, 2011; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-10-0022
What problem does this paper attempt to address?