Title 1 Response Variability to High Rates of Electric Stimulation in Retinal Ganglion Cells. 2 3 Authors 4

Changsi Cai,Q. Ren,N. Desai,J. Rizzo,S. Fried,S. Fried

2011-01-01

Abstract:30 31 Keywords 32 Retinal prosthesis 33 Electric stimulation 34 Ganglion cells 35 Initial segment 36 37 38 Abstract 39 To improve the quality of prosthetic vision, it is important to understand how 40 retinal neurons respond to electric stimulation. Previous studies present 41 conflicting reports as to the maximum rate at which retinal ganglion cells can 42 'follow' pulse trains, i.e. generate one spike for each pulse of the train. Here, we 43 measured the response of 5 different types of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to 44 pulse trains of 100-700 Hz. Surprisingly, we found significant heterogeneity in the 45 ability of different types to follow pulse trains. For example, brisk transient (BT) 46 ganglion cells could reliably 'follow' pulse rates up to 600 pulses per second 47 (PPS). In contrast, other types could not even follow rates of 200 PPS. There 48 was additional heterogeneity in the response patterns across those types that 49 could not follow high-rate trains. For example, some types generated action 50 potentials in response to approximately every other pulse while other types 51 generated one spike per pulse for a few consecutive pulses and then did not 52 generate any spikes in response to the next few pulses. Interestingly, in the types 53 that could not follow high-rate trains we found a second type of response: many 54 pulses of the train elicited a biphasic waveform with an amplitude much smaller 55 than that of standard action potentials. This small waveform was often observed 56 following every pulse for which a standard spike was not elicited. A possible 57 origin of the small waveform and its implication for effective retinal stimulation are 58 discussed. 59 60 61 62 Introduction 63 64 Retinal prosthetics strive to restore vision to those blinded by outer retinal degenerative 65 diseases such as macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa by electrically 66 stimulating surviving retinal neurons (Humayun et al. 1996; Rizzo et al. 2003; Zrenner et 67 al. 2009). Although the ability to create visual sensations is now well established, the 68 quality and consistency of vision elicited by these devices is still highly variable. To 69 improve the quality of elicited vision, much effort is being devoted towards understanding 70 the neural activity arising from electric stimulation (Behrend et al. 72 2007). It seems intuitive that a stimulation strategy that matched some (or all) of the 73 signaling …