Evaluating Gait with Force Sensing Insoles 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Autograft Comparison
Rachel E. Cherelstein,Christopher Kuenze,Matthew S. Harkey,Michelle C. Walaszek,Corey Grozier,Emily R. Brumfield,Jennifer N. Lewis,Garrison A. Hughes,Edward S. Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003554
2024-09-16
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:ABSTRACT Introduction Aberrant knee mechanics during gait 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are associated with markers of knee cartilage degeneration. The purpose of this study was to compare loading during walking gait in QT, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autograft patients 6 months post-ACLR using loadsol single sensor insoles, and to evaluate associations between loading and patient reported outcomes. Methods 72 patients (13-40 years) who underwent unilateral, primary ACLR with BPTB, QT, or HT autograft completed treadmill gait assessment, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey and the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) survey 6 ± 1 months post-ACLR. Ground reaction forces were collected using loadsols. Limb symmetry indices (LSI) for peak impact force (PIF), loading response instantaneous loading rate (ILR), and loading response average loading rate (ALR) were compared between groups using separate ANCOVAs. Survey scores were compared between groups using one-way ANOVAs. The relationships between IKDC, ACL-RSI, and LSIs were compared using Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients. Results There were no significant differences between graft sources for LSI in PIF, ILR, ALR, nor impulse. Patient-reported knee function was significantly different between graft source groups with the BPTB group reporting the highest IKDC scores; however, there was no significant difference between groups for ACL-RSI score. There were no significant associations between IKDC score, ACL-RSI score, and biomechanical symmetry among any of the graft source groups. Conclusions Autograft type does not influence PIF, ILR, ALR, or impulse during walking 6 months post-ACLR. Limb symmetry during gait is not strongly associated with patient reported outcomes regardless of graft source. Loadsols appear to be a suitable tool for use in the clinical rehabilitation setting.
sport sciences