EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY WITHIN THE LEFT AND RIGHT EXECUTIVE CONTROL NETWORKS IN MCI AND AD
Cole John Cook,Gyujoon Hwang,Veena A. Nair,Mary-Elizabeth Pasquesi,Andrew L. Alexander,Piero G. Antuono,Sanjay Asthana,Rasmus Birn,Cynthia Carlsson,Guangyu Chen,Dorothy Farrar Edwards,Malgorzata Franczak,Joseph S. Goveas,Sterling C. Johnson,Steven Kecskemeti,Arman P. Kulkarni,Rosaleena Mohanty,Brittany Moreno,Andrew S. Nencka,Ozioma C. Okonkwo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4186
2019-01-01
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:The default mode network, implicated in various types of memory, is often investigated in Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD patients often exhibit both memory impairments and executive dysfunction. The executive control network (ECN), thought to be linked with the default mode network and implicated in executive function, differs in functional connectivity, often measured using Pearson correlation, between healthy controls and individuals with AD (Agosta et al., 2012). Differences in effective connectivity, a measure of causal neuronal interaction, as measured using Granger causality were noted between healthy controls, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and individuals with AD (Cai et al., 2017). ECN effective connectivity (EC) was explored here using dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to obtain EC at the unobserved neuronal level rather than the observed BOLD signal by accounting for local differences in hemodynamic response. Whole-brain simultaneous multi-slice resting state fMRI data were acquired on 3T GE 750 scanners at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Medical College of Wisconsin (8 bands, 72 slices, TR 802 ms, voxel size 2 mm isotropic). Participants were enrolled in the NIH-sponsored Alzheimer's Disease Connectome Project (Table 1). Slice time correction was applied prior to the Human Connectome Project minimal preprocessing pipeline (Glasser et al., 2013). Separate fully connected spectral DCMs (Friston, Kahan, Biswal, and Razi, 2014) were constructed for the Stanford FIND lab's left and right ECN (Shirer, Ryali, Rykhlevskaia, Menon, and Greicius, 2012) following nuisance regression. Group differences were investigated via parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) models (Friston et al., 2016). Automated search removed non-evident parameters and a threshold of posterior probability of 95% was used. Three/nine parameters in the left ECN differed between controls and individuals with MCI/AD (Table 2). Eight/seven parameters in the right ECN differed between controls and individuals with MCI/AD (Table 3). All parameters in the left ECN which differed in MCI compared to controls also differed in AD while 6 difference parameters were in common in the right ECN.