Interactive comment on “ Missing OH source in a suburban environment near Beijing : observed and modelled OH and HO 2 concentrations in summer 2006 ” by K

K. D. Lu
2012-01-01
Abstract:General comments The manuscript describes a detailed analysis of HOx photochemistry during the CAREBeijing2006 campaign. The work focuses on missing source of the OH radical but also contains a thorough analysis of OH reactivity, the OH sink term. The work studies the measured constraints of the ROx budget and also investigates different modells of HOx photochemistry in detail in view of the missing OH source terms. The findings add to the growing evidence of large sources of OH missing from modells under lowNOx conditions. The work shows that unknown species that convert HO2 to OH can explain the missing OH source. In contrast to the authors’ previous study in the Pearl River Delta (Lu et al. 2012), they conclude that the Leuven isoprene mechanism does reasonably well in explaining the observations. The authors also analyze a high NOx day with large missing OH sources, which is very interesting. The work adds to the growing number of studies investigating this topic, which is highly relevant. The paper is well written, presents a thorough analysis, is timely, and in the scope of ACPD. I
What problem does this paper attempt to address?