Pierre Friedlingstein,Michael O'Sullivan,Matthew W. Jones,Robbie M. Andrew,Judith Hauck,Are Olsen,Glen P. Peters,Wouter Peters,Julia Pongratz,Stephen Sitch,Corinne Le Quéré,Josep G. Canadell,Philippe Ciais,Robert B. Jackson,Simone Alin,Luiz E. O. C. Aragão,Almut Arneth,Vivek Arora,Nicholas R. Bates,Meike Becker,Alice Benoit-Cattin,Henry C. Bittig,Laurent Bopp,Selma Bultan,Naveen Chandra,Frédéric Chevallier,Louise P. Chini,Wiley Evans,Liesbeth Florentie,Piers M. Forster,Thomas Gasser,Marion Gehlen,Dennis Gilfillan,Thanos Gkritzalis,Luke Gregor,Nicolas Gruber,Ian Harris,Kerstin Hartung,Vanessa Haverd,Richard A. Houghton,Tatiana Ilyina,Atul K. Jain,Emilie Joetzjer,Koji Kadono,Etsushi Kato,Vassilis Kitidis,Jan Ivar Korsbakken,Peter Landschützer,Nathalie Lefèvre,Andrew Lenton,Sebastien Lienert,Zhu Liu,Danica Lombardozzi,Gregg Marland,Nicolas Metzl,David R Munro,Julia E. M. S. Nabel,Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka,Yosuke Niwa,Kevin O'Brien,Tsuneo Ono,Paul I. Palmer,Denis Pierrot,Benjamin Poulter,Laure Resplandy,Eddy Robertson,Christian Rödenbeck,Jörg Schwinger,Roland Séférian,Ingunn Skjelvan,Adam J. P. Smith,Adrienne J. Sutton,Toste Tanhua,Pieter P. Tans,Hanqin Tian,Bronte Tilbrook,Guido van der Werf,Nicolas Vuichard,Anthony P. Walker,Rik Wanninkhof,Andrew J. Watson,David Willis,Andrew J. Wiltshire,Wenping Yuan,Xu Yue,Sönke Zaehle

Abstract:<ul class="content affiliation-list"><li>1College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK</li> <li>2Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS-ENS-UPMC-X, Département de Géosciences, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France</li> <li>3Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK</li> <li>4CICERO Center for International Climate Research, Oslo 0349, Norway</li> <li>5Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Postfach 120161, 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany</li> <li>6Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway</li> <li>7Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway</li> <li>8Wageningen University, Environmental Sciences Group, P.O. Box 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands</li> <li>9University of Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research, Groningen, the Netherlands</li> <li>10Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Luisenstr. 37, 80333 München, Germany</li> <li>11Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany</li> <li>12College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK</li> <li>13CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, ACT 2101, Australia</li> <li>14Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France</li> <li>15Department of Earth System Science, Woods Institute for the Environment, and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2210, United States of America</li> <li>16National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (NOAA/PMEL), 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, USA</li> <li>17Remote Sensing Division, National Institute for Space Research, São José dos Campos, Brazil</li> <li>18Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research/Atmospheric Environmental Research, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany</li> <li>19Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada</li> <li>20Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS), 17 Biological Lane, St. Georges, GE01, Bermuda</li> <li>21Department of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK</li> <li>22Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, Fornubudir 5, 220 Hafnarfjordur, Iceland</li> <li>23Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemuende (IOW), Seestrasse 15; 18119 Rostock, Germany</li> <li>24Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique / Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure / Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France</li> <li>25Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, 236-0001</li> <li>26Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan</li> <li>27Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA</li> <li>28Hakai Institute, Heriot Bay, BC, Canada</li> <li>29Priestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</li> <li>30International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1 A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria</li> <li>31Research Institute for Environment, Energy, and Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA</li> <li>32Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), InnovOceanSite, Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400 Ostend, Belgium</li> <li>33Environmental Physics Group, ETH Zürich, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics and Center for Climate Systems Modeling (C2SM), Zurich, Switzerland</li> <li>34NCAS-Climate, Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK</li> <li>35Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der -Abstract Truncated-

Path-dependent reduction in emission budgets caused by permafrost CO 2 and CH 4 release

Path-dependent Reductions in CO2 Emission Budgets Caused by Permafrost Carbon Release

Two decades of permafrost region CO2, CH4, and N2O budgets suggest a small net greenhouse gas source to the atmosphere

Author Correction: Path-dependent reductions in CO 2 emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release

A Strong Mitigation Scenario Maintains Climate Neutrality of Northern Peatlands

Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO2 Sink and CH4 and N2O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Methods

Improving the Simulation of Permafrost Extent by Representing the Multi-Tiling Energy Budgets in ORCHIDEE-MICT Model

Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Across the Northern High Latitudes

The Net GHG Balance and Budget of the Permafrost Region (2000-2020) from Ecosystem Flux Upscaling

A Simplified, Data-Constrained Approach to Estimate the Permafrost Carbon–climate Feedback

Global Carbon Budget 2015

Global Carbon Budget 2020

Carbon Stocks and Fluxes in the High Latitudes: Using Site-Level Data to Evaluate Earth System Models

Permafrost Carbon: Progress on Understanding Stocks and Fluxes Across Northern Terrestrial Ecosystems

Variability in the Sensitivity among Model Simulations of Permafrost and Carbon Dynamics in the Permafrost Region Between 1960 and 2009

Disaggregating the Carbon Exchange of Degrading Permafrost Peatlands Using Bayesian Deep Learning

Ecosystem CO2 Exchange and Its Economic Implications in Northern Permafrost Regions in the 21st Century

Identifying Barriers to Estimating Carbon Release From Interacting Feedbacks in a Warming Arctic

Simulating the Earth System Response to Negative Emissions

Dependence of the Evolution of Carbon Dynamics in the Northern Permafrost Region on the Trajectory of Climate Change

Corrigendum: A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018 (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 073005)