Different energy densities of Nd : YAG laser iridotomy in treatment of angle-closure glaucoma

Lina Zhang,Yunxia Hu,Wu Huang,Lisha Ni,Bole Wu,Hexiang Gao,Xinming Ye,Linping Liu,Min,Chen,Kaijun Wang
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Nd:YAG laser angle-closure glaucoma (AcG) incision on the surrounding membrane on corneal endothelial cells under different energy densities. Methods: Fifty-six AcG patients (73 eyes) in our department from June 2012 to June 2015 were enrolled. According to the percentile of total energy of Nd:YAG laser, the patients are divided into high energy (n=20), medium energy (n=17), and low energy (n=19) groups and are subjected to surrounding membrane incision. The difference in corneal endothelial cell damage among the three groups is compared before and after treatment. The correlation between Nd:YAG laser energy and cell density of 1 month post-operation was evaluated by Pearson correlation test. Results: The cell density, maximum and minimum cell area, average cell area and hexagonal cell percentage were not statistical different before and after treatment in low energy and median energy group (P>0.05). The cell density, coefficient variation and average cell area were significant increased after operation (P<0.05); However, the minimun cell area and hexagonal cell percentage were significant decreased after operation (P<0.05). No significant correlation between Nd:YAG laser energy and cell density was found in low and moderate energy group (P>0.05). However, significant negative correlation between Nd:YAG laser energy and cell density was found in the high energy group (rpearson=0.42, P=0.03). Conclusion: Lowand medium-energy Nd:YAG laser membrane surrounding incision (MSI) does not exert any significant damage to corneal endothelial cells, and their outcomes are accurate and safe. However, high-energy Nd:YAG laser MSI, which has a total laser energy of over 45 mJ, significantly damages corneal endothelial cells.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?