The Syntax of Clausal Negation in French and English Speakers ’ L 2 Chinese Boping Yuan

Boping Yuan
2003-01-01
Abstract:The subject NP is base-generated in Spec of VP and moves to the specifier of AgrP to enter into an agreement relation with the nominal features of the Agr node. The finite verb is base-generated as the head of VP and moves to Agr via T. As can be seen from (1), French clausal negation is bipartite and consists of an element “ne”, which can be omitted in colloquial French, and an element “pas”. As “ne” is attached to the finite verb with which it moves to Agr (and to C in French questions), and since “pas” is not affected by the movement of the finite verb, “ne” is considered an affix heading a projection of NegP whose specifier is occupied by the negative operator “pas”. When the finite verb raises to the head of NegP, “ne” cliticizes to the verb, which forms one complex head before raising further up to Agr. It is suggested (cf. Pollock 1989, Chomsky 1993, 1995) that the nature of functional
What problem does this paper attempt to address?