Priority-Based Affirmative Action in School Choice

Zhenhua Jiao,Guoqiang Tian

2017-01-01

Abstract:This paper investigates the affirmative action in school choice problems. We show that the student-proposing deferred acceptance (henceforth, DA) algorithm is (stable and) minimally responsive to the priority-based affirmative action if schools have the same priority orders over students, while no such a mechanism exists for quota-based or reserve-based affirmative action even if all schools have the same priorities. We also show that the DA algorithm makes no minority student worse off under a stronger priority-based affirmative action policy where the minority is given full priority. Moreover, under the DA algorithm, if a market gives full priority to the minority, then the market and a stronger priority-based (and reserve-based) affirmative action produce the same assignment outcome. Finally, we consider two efficiency improved mechanisms– Kesten’s efficiency-adjusted deferred acceptance mechanism (EADAM) and DA-TTC mechanism. We show that neither EADAM nor DA-TTC respects improvements (in the sense of Balinski and Sönmez (1999)), and consequently, neither of the two mechanisms is minimally responsive to the priority-based affirmative action policy.