Abstract:This paper investigates the internal flow characteristics of an aggressive S-shaped air bleeding manifold under typical working condition with the throttle cone opening degree of 15% and the inlet Mach number of 0.34 by experimental and numerical simulation methods. Based on the experimental results of total pressure recovery coefficient, the realizable kε model was selected as a suitable turbulence model for the air bleeding manifold numerical simulation by analyzing the numerical results of different turbulence models. The numerical simulation results show that the flow separation occurs at the upper wall and lower wall near the first bend, which also leads to the vortex pair and causes the nonuniformity of the flow field in the exit. The curvature of the end walls and the cross-sectional area variation of air bleeding manifold have greatly influence on the flow structure. The severe deflectionon the lower wall of the first bend is the main factor causing the flow separation and total pressure loss. The mass-averaged total pressure recovery coefficient in exit is 0.9818, and the synthesis distortion index DC(60) in the exit is 0.1334.. INTRODUCTION Air bleeding manifold is an important component in the active clearance control system of high-pressure turbine. The study of the internal characteristic and the loss mechanism will provide theoretical basis for optimal design of the air bleeding manifold. In this paper, the air bleeding manifold is an aggressive S-shaped duct with variable geometric crosssection. The study on flow characteristics of S-shaped duct in aero-engine is focused on compressor and turbine intermediate duct [1-3], inlet [4-5] and nozzle [6]. It is very famous that AIDA-Aggressive Intermediate Duct Aerodynamics project within the 6th framework program funded by the European Commission two projects dealing exclusively or partly with the topic of intermediate ducts. The outcomes of the AIDA project gives turbine and compressor engineers access to a whole new class of validated “aggressive” duct designs and design tools that will allow a much better optimization of the whole compression and turbine system [7] . The pressure distribution in an S-shaped diffuser depends not only on the area change such as in straight-walled channels, but also upon the curvature of the end walls and hence of the streamlines. S-shaped diffuser has a major effect on the boundary layer behavior at the end walls, which is most critical due to the strongest adverse pressure gradients right after strong wall curvatures [7]. This feature makes the numerical simulation and testing of an aggressive S-shaped diffuser difficult. Wellborn et al. [8] observed the intense mixture of the boundary layer and the core flow in the wind tunnel experiment with the inlet Mach number of 0.6. The counter-rotating vortices convected low momentum fluid of the boundary layer toward the center of the duct, and a large region of streamwise flow separation occurred within the duct. A large number of experimental studies have been carried out on the flow characteristics of S-shaped duct [9-13]. About the numerical simulation study, many researchers have done lots of work to find more accurate turbulence models for numerical simulation [14-18]. Waston et al. [18] calculated the NASA 30/30 geometric model using RANS (S-A, k-ε and SST k-ω model) and zonal large eddy simulation (RANS/LES) approaches. It was found that LES could more reliably predict large degrees of separation, but the mesh requirements and consequent cost render the technique prohibitively expensive for the near future, certainly unacceptably so for routine calculations as part of an ongoing design process. Asghar et al.[19-20] explored the flow characteristics of a baseline Sshaped diffuser using experiment and numerical simulation methods. They concluded that the presence of streamwise and circumferential pressure gradients led to the 3-D flow and the flow distortion in the exit. In addition, different geometry parameters of the S-shaped diffuser would have greatly influence on the flow characteristics. In this paper, the internal flow characteristics of an aggressive S-shaped air bleeding manifold of high-pressure turbine with active clearance

Flow characteristics in the air bleeding manifold

Numerical Simulation of Flow Characteristic on Air Bleeding Manifold

Vortex structure control based bleed in axial compressor cascade with tip clearance using large eddy simulation

SHOCK INDUCED SEPARATING FLOWS IN SCRAMJET INTAKES

Flow Development Through an S-Shaped Diffusing Duct

Bleed air CFD modelling in aerodynamic simulation of A heavy duty gas turbine compressor

Performance and flow characteristics of a novel air bleeding aerodynamic combustor diffuser

Numerical Study of the Air Bleeding Caused Non-Uniformity in Axial Compressor

Internal flow mechanism of an aggressive compressor transition duct

A Numerical Study On The Flow Mechanism Of Performance Improvement Of A Wide-Angle Diffuser By Inserting A Short Splitter Vane

Unsteady Flow Simulations in A Three-Lobe Positive Displacement Blower

The Effect of the Circumferential Position of Duct Hole on the Non-uniformity in the Axial Compressor

Experimental simulation methodology and spatial transition of complex distortion fields in a S-shaped inlet

Flow Characteristic Experiment on Air Bleeding Manifold of High-pressure Turbine

Non-uniform flow characteristics and rotating instability of a transonic high-pressure compressor rotor with cavity bleed

Design performance evaluation and vortex structure investigation of different S-shaped intermediate turbine ducts

Numerical Investigation Of Flow Separation Control Of Low-Pressure High-Lift Blade With Different Grooves And Protrusions

Flow Characteristics of a Pipe Diffuser for Centrifugal Compressors

Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Performance Affected by Spiral Inlet and Outlet in a Positive Displacement Blower

Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Real Industrial Bleeding Geometry in a High-Speed Compressor Stage

Active Flow Control in an S-shaped Duct at Mach 0.4 Using Sweeping Jet Actuators