Impact of TNFRSF 6 B / DcR 3 neutralization antibody and SiRNA on biological function of MCF-7 breast cancer cells

Wei Tang,Rui Zhang,Meng-Tong Jiang,Wen-Liang Guo,Ai-Hua Lan,Kai-Teng Cai,Dan-Dan Xiong,Kang-Lai Wei,Min-Hua Rong,Jia-Hua Yu,Gang Chen
2016-01-01
Abstract:Background and Aim: Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6b (TNFRSF6B), also identified as DcR3, has been stated to play a crucial role in the tumorigenesis and progression of several cancers. However, the biological function and clinical role of DcR3 in breast cancer (BRCA) has not been fully clarified. Hence, the aim of the study was to explore the impact of DcR3 on biological function of BRCA cells with in vitro experiments, as well as to assess the clinical significance of DcR3 bases on a meta-analysis and public data. Material and Methods: DcR3 neutralization antibody and DcR3-siRNA were transfected into BRCA MCF-7 cells. Three approaches including MTS assay, viability assay and Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide (PI) double staining assay were employed to examine the cell growth. Furthermore, the apoptosis was monitored by fluorescent caspase-3/7 assay and the Hoechst 33342/PI assay. Information of the association of DcR3 expression and some clinicopathological parameters including tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, clinical TNM stage, etc. were extracted in BRCA related literature, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated by Forest plot in the current meta-analysis. Furthermore, data mining was performed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public database to verify the clinical significance of DcR3 in BRCA. Results: Both DcR3 neutralization antibody and siRNA showed obvious cell growth suppression effect on BRCA MCF-7 cells as detected by three methods. Consistently, DcR3 neutralization antibody and siRNA also yielded remarkable impact on inducing caspase-3/7 activity and apoptosis. DcR3-siRNA led to a much more potent influence on biological function than DcR3 neutralization antibody in BRCA cells. In the meta-analysis, over-expression of DcR3 was strongly interrelated with the occurrence of BRCA, also differentiation, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. Moreover, 9% genetic alteration was noted based on TCGA database in 1105 BRCA samples. Conclusions: The present discoveries propose that the over-expression of DcR3 might be associated with the malignant aggressiveness and progression of BRCA, via influencing cell growth and apoptosis. DcR3 may become a probable notable target for the molecular therapy of BRCA. But the specific pathway and precise molecular mechanisms of DcR3 in BRCA cells remain to be further explored.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?