II . Constraining the Hybrid Jet Model

Liang Li
2019-01-01
Abstract:A more general picture in explaining the origin of the jet composition of gammaray bursts (GRBs), namely, the hybrid jet model (introduced another magnetization parameter σ0 on the basis of the traditional fireball model), has been well studied in Gao & Zhang (2015), but still has not applied to a large GRB sample. Here, we first employ the “top-down” approach in Gao & Zhang (2015) to diagnose the properties at central engine to see how the hybrid model can account for the observed data as well, using a full Fermi GRB sample (8 bursts) with the detected photosphere component, as presented in Li (2019) (our Paper I). We derive all physical parameters for a hybrid problem with three typical r0 values (r0=10 7 cm, 10 cm, and 10 cm). We find the dimensionless entropy η 1 for all the cases while (1+σ0) >1 for 5 bursts (GRB 081224, GRB 110721A, GRB 090719, GRB 100707, and GRB 100724), which indicate that in addition to a hot fireball component, another a cold Poynting-flux component may also play an important role. Other 3 bursts (GRB 190114C, GRB 090902B, and GRB 160107) for (1+σ0) >1 show r0-dependent behavior. Our analysis also shows that a few time bins for all r0 in GRB 081224 and GRB 110721A, the magnetization parameter at ∼10cm (1+σr15) greater than unity, which indicates non-thermal radiation mechanism for these bursts may be ICMART event rather than internal shocks. Other GRBs either exhibit r0-dependent characteristic (GRB 090719, GRB 100707, GRB 100724B, and GRB 160107), or no time bin (GRB 190114C and GRB 090902B) satisfy (1+σr15) >1. We conclude that a majority of bursts (probably all) can be well interpreted by the hybrid jet problem, and our analysis opens up a new window to understand the jet composition of GRBs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?