Abstract:The superposition principle of quantum mechanics states that any linear combination of two state vectors |0〉 and |1〉 represents an equally valid physical state of the quantum system: |ψ〉 = a|0〉+ b|1〉. For nonzero coefficients a and b, the state |ψ〉 will not be orthogonal to either |0〉 or |1〉, and |ψ〉 is traditionally said to be a coherent superposition of |0〉 and |1〉. Identifying coherence in this sense involves first stipulating a distinguished basis, {|0〉, |1〉, |2〉, · · · }, which is singled out by the unavoidable interaction with the environment, also known as decoherence [1]. An application of the superposition principle to many-body systems leads to quantum entanglement [2], a nonclassical type of correlation and an important resource for quantum technology. Recent results show that not all quantum technological tasks require the presence of entanglement, but can make use of other nonclassical features such as quantum discord [3] and even quantum coherence [4]. Motivated by this latter discovery, researchers have recently begun developing a resource theory of quantum coherence (see [4] for a review). This resource theory aims to rigorously quantify the amount of coherence in different quantum states and quantum processes, while further studying the use of coherence in quantum technologies, including quantum metrology, quantum computation, quantum random number generation, and quantum communication. From this resource-theoretic perspective, quantum coherence is characterized as some fungible property of quantum states that can be manipulated and exchanged from one system to the next. This issue contributes to various aspects of the resource theory of coherence. Fundamental properties of coherence quantifiers are studied for single particles (Rastegin 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414011, Liu et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414012, Rana and Lewenstein 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414002, Liu et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414018 and Johnston et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414010) and multipartite settings (Kraft and Piani 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414013, Xi 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414016, Takahashi and Chitambar 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414003 and Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Notes on Fidelity of Coherence

Partial Coherence and Quantum Correlation with Fidelity and Affinity Distances

Family of Coherence Measures and Duality Between Quantum Coherence and Path Distinguishability

Quantifying Dynamical Coherence with Coherence Measures

Interrelation Between Partial Coherence and Quantum Correlations

Coherence Concurrence

Theory-Independent Measure of Coherence

Fidelity of a Bose–Einstein Condensates

Genetically lean and fat sheep differ in their growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing factor.

Entanglement Fidelity As A Measure of Preservation of Entanglement in Local Noisy Process

Detecting non-Markovianity via quantified coherence: theory and experiments

Basis-independent Coherence and its Applications

Operator Fidelity Susceptibility, Decoherence, And Quantum Criticality

A new fidelity of quantum channel evolution and its geometric interpretation

Entanglement Fidelity and Entanglement Preserving

Preface: Quantum Coherence

Coherence and visibility in Fano interferometers

Fidelity of Physical Measurements

Fidelity a pair of two-level atoms' quantum states in the dissipative cavity

Accessible Coherence and Coherence Distribution

Bures fidelity of displaced squeezed thermal states