F-FLT PET/CT imaging is not competent for the pretreatment evaluation of metastatic gastric cancer: a comparison with F-FDG PET/CT imaging

Min Zhou,Chen-chen Wang,Silong Hu,Yongping Zhang,Zhi-feng Yao,Jieshou Li,Weijian Guo,Yingjian Zhang
2013-01-01
Abstract:Results Accumulation of focal activity was visible in primary tumors on F-FLT PET/CT in 36/39 patients and on F-FDG PET/CT in 37/39 patients, with sensitivities of 92.3 and 94.9%, respectively. Further, three of the 36 FLT-avid primary tumors were almost undetected because they were covered by a high background hepatic uptake. Because of the high physiological uptake of F-FLT in the liver [median maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 5.5, range 4.5–8.3] and the bone marrow (median SUVmax 14.8, range 10.8–22.0), the sensitivity of F-FLT PET/CT versus F-FDG PET/CT for detecting liver metastases and bone metastases was 30.0% (6/20) versus 100% (20/20) and 1/5 (20.0%) versus 5/5 (100%), respectively (P < 0.05). Metabolically positive findings of lymph node, peritoneal, and ovarian metastases were similar between the two modalities: 96.8% (30/31) versus 93.5% (29/31), 89.5% (17/19) versus 94.7% (18/19), and 90.9% (10/11) versus 90.9% (10/11) of patients for F-FLT versus F-FDG, respectively (P > 0.05).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?