Gait classification of knee osteoarthritis patients using shoe-embedded internal measurement units sensor
Ahmed Raza,Yusuke Sekiguchi,Haruki Yaguchi,Keita Honda,Kenichiro Fukushi,Chenhui Huang,Kazuki Ihara,Yoshitaka Nozaki,Kentaro Nakahara,Shin-Ichi Izumi,Satoru Ebihara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106285
IF: 2.034
2024-06-06
Clinical Biomechanics
Abstract:Background Knee osteoarthritis negatively affects the gait of patients, especially that of elderly people. However, the assessment of wearable sensors in knee osteoarthritis patients has been under-researched. During clinical assessments, patients may change their gait patterns under the placebo effect, whereas wearable sensors can be used in any environment. Methods Sixty patients with knee osteoarthritis and 20 control subjects were included in the study. Wearing shoes with an IMU sensor embedded in the insoles, the participants were required to walk along a walkway. The sensor data were collected during the gait. To discriminate between healthy and knee osteoarthritis patients and to classify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis patients (patients scheduled for surgery vs. patients not scheduled for surgery; bilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis vs. unilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis), we used a machine learning approach called the support vector machine. A total of 88 features were extracted and used for classification. Findings The patients vs. healthy participants were classified with 71% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 56% specificity. The "patients scheduled for surgery" vs. "patients not scheduled for surgery" were classified with 83% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, and 81% specificity. The bilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis vs. unilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis was classified with 81% accuracy, 75% sensitivity, and 79% specificity. Interpretation Gait analysis using wearable sensors and machine learning can discriminate between healthy and knee osteoarthritis patients and classify different subgroups with reasonable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed approach requires no complex gait factors and is not limited to controlled laboratory settings.
engineering, biomedical,orthopedics,sport sciences