Supplementary material : C 3 AE : Exploring the Limits of Compact Model for Age Estimation

Chao Zhang,Shuaicheng Liu,Xun Xu,Ce Zhu

2019-01-01

Abstract:In this section, some detailed results and explanations are included to compare with our plain model. In order to validate our claims that for small size image and model, standard convolution performs better than depth-wise convolution, several variants on MobileNet-V2 and ShuffleNetV2 are compared with the plain model of C3AE. In addition, we also compare with the competitive SSR. The curve of train/validation losses on MobileNet-V2, ShuffleNet-V2, SSR are given in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 (Some partial results are shown in Fig. 4 (main manuscript)). On one hand, for any finetuning of factors in Tab. 2 (main manuscript), the plain model of C3AE consistently achieves better result. On the other hand, considering the gap between train and validation loss, our plain model is the lowest. We could argue that the plain model of C3AE is more robust on the generalization. From Fig. 3, our plain model performs better than SSR, both with standard convolution. In the experimental implementation, SSR adopts the full model instead of the plain model. This comparison further shows the superiority of our plain model. In general, Tab. 2 (main manuscript), Fig. 1, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, with three large datasets IMDB (460,000 images), WIKI (62,000 images) and Morph II(55,000 images), supports the effectiveness of our claims.