Abstract:The ff15ipq protein force field is a fixed charge model built by automated tools based on the two charge sets of the implicitly polarized charge method: one set (appropriate for vacuum) for deriving bonded parameters and the other (appropriate for aqueous solution) for running simulations. The duality is intended to treat water-induced electronic polarization with an understanding that fitting data for bonded parameters will come from quantum mechanical calculations in the gas phase. In this study, we compare ff15ipq to two alternatives produced with the same fitting software and a further expanded data set but following more conventional methods for tailoring bonded parameters (harmonic angle terms and torsion potentials) to the charge model. First, ff15ipq-Qsolv derives bonded parameters in the context of the ff15ipq solution phase charge set. Second, ff15ipq-Vac takes ff15ipq's bonded parameters and runs simulations with the vacuum phase charge set used to derive those parameters. The IPolQ charge model and associated protocol for deriving bonded parameters are shown to be an incremental improvement over protocols that do not account for the material phases of each source of their fitting data. Both force fields incorporating the polarized charge set depict stable globular proteins and have varying degrees of success modeling the metastability of short (5-19 residues) peptides. In this particular case, ff15ipq-Qsolv increases stability in a number of α-helices, correctly obtaining 70% helical character in the K19 system at 275 K and showing appropriately diminishing content up to 325 K, but overestimating the helical fraction of AAQAA3 by 50% or more, forming long-lived α-helices in simulations of a β-hairpin, and increasing the likelihood that the disordered p53 N-terminal peptide will also form a helix. This may indicate a systematic bias imparted by the ff15ipq-Qsolv parameter development strategy, which has the hallmarks of strategies used to develop other popular force fields, and may explain some of the need for manual corrections in this force fields' evolution. In contrast, ff15ipq-Vac incorrectly depicts globular protein unfolding in numerous systems tested, including Trp cage, villin, lysozyme, and GB3, and does not perform any better than ff15ipq or ff15ipq-Qsolv in tests on short peptides. We analyze the free energy surfaces of individual amino acid dipeptides and the electrostatic potential energy surfaces of each charge model to explain the differences.

Chapter 5 Treatment of Hydrogen Bonds in Protein Simulations

Development of an Effective Polarizable Bond Method for Biomolecular Simulation.

Electronic Polarization Stabilizes Tertiary Structure Prediction of HP-36.

Two Cu21 clusters with pseudo-D3 symmetry derived from the D-saccharate pentaanion, C6H5O8(5-).

Explicit treatment of hydrogen bonds in the Universal Force Field: validation and application for Metal-Organic Frameworks, hydrates and host-guest complexes

Links between the charge model and bonded parameter force constants in biomolecular force fields

Parametrizing A Polarizable Force Field from Ab Initio Data. I. the Fluctuating Point Charge Model

Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation

Charge Interactions in a Highly Charge-depleted Protein

Treating Polarization Effects in Charged and Polar Bio-Molecules Through Variable Electrostatic Parameters

Benchmarking polarizable and non-polarizable force fields for Ca2+-peptides against a comprehensive QM dataset

Modeling of the Response of Hydrogen Bond Properties on an External Electric Field: Geometry, NMR Chemical Shift, Spin-Spin Scalar Coupling

Geometrical Preferences of the Hydrogen Bonds on Protein-Ligand Binding Interface Derived from Statistical Surveys and Quantum Mechanics Calculations.

A Force Balanced Fragmentation Method for Ab Initio Molecular Dynamic Simulation of Protein

Non-Aqueous Ion Pairing Exemplifies the Case for Including Electronic Polarization in Molecular Dynamics Simulations

A quantum mechanical computational method for modeling electrostatic and solvation effects of protein

Polarisable force fields: what do they add in biomolecular simulations?

Ab Initio Path-Integral Molecular Dynamics and the Quantum Nature of Hydrogen Bonds

Balancing Group 1 Monoatomic Ion-Polar Compound Interactions in the Polarizable Drude Force Field: Application in Protein and Nucleic Acid Systems

Proton transfer reactions and hydrogen-bond networks in protein environments

Accounting for electronic polarization in nonpolarizable force fields