Reply to the Letter to the Editor Reply to Tellez-Zenteno

Thierry Christophe Roth,Ralph Alexander Schmid,Thomas J. Birdas
2006-01-01
Abstract:D ow naded rom http/academ ic.p.com /ejcts/articlect/30/2/412/362437 idea as Roth et al. [1] that thymectomy before the pregnancy can improve the evolution of MG during the pregnancy. The most important limitation of the study of Roth et al. [1] is the sample size and due to the unpredictable course of myasthenia gravis during pregnancy the observation about a better prognosis in thymectomizedmothers could be obtained only by chance. The second observation in this study about a better prognosis in babies of mothers with myasthenia gravis should be taken carefully. The prevalence of transient neonatal myasthenia gravis is highly variable in reports, going from 5 to 30% and mainly explained by the different methods to perform the diagnosis but potentially a genetic variation has been suggested [5]. In the study by Roth et al. [1], two newborns had symptoms after the delivery and both belonged to the nonthymectomized group of mothers. Again this observation could be derived only due to the small sample size of the study and not related directly with thymectomy status of the mother. Overall, this study has an interesting observation but more investigation is required.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?