Global Analysis of Continental Boundary Layer New Particle Formation Based on Long-Term Measurements

Tuomo Nieminen,Veli-Matti Kerminen,Tuukka Petaja,Pasi P. Aalto,Mikhail Arshinov,Eija Asmi,Urs Baltensperger,David C. S. Beddows,Johan Paul Beukes,Don Collins,Aijun Ding,Roy M. Harrison,Bas Henzing,Rakesh Hooda,Min Hu,Urmas Horrak,Niku Kivekas,Kaupo Komsaare,Radovan Krejci,Adam Kristensson,Lauri Laakso,Ari Laaksonen,W. Richard Leaitch,Heikki Lihavainen,Nikolaos Mihalopoulos,Zoltan Nemeth,Wei Nie,Colin O'Dowd,Imre Salma,Karine Sellegri,Birgitta Svenningsson,Erik Swietlicki,Peter Tunved,Vidmantas Ulevicius,Ville Vakkari,Marko Vana,Alfred Wiedensohler,Zhijun Wu,Annele Virtanen,Markku Kulmala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018
IF: 6.3
2018-01-01
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:L6-7: Why, specifically, are only March-May and Dec-Feb being compared here? Is March-May the max and Dec-Feb the min? It would be good to say this, because now the choice seems arbitrary. March-May was indeed the maximum in NPF occurrence frequencies and Dec-Feb minimum, averaged globally at these 36 measurement sites. As suggested by the referee, we have clarified this sentence in the revised manuscript: “We found that the NPF frequency has a strong seasonal variability. At the measurement sites analyzed in this study, NPF occurs most frequently in March-May (on about 30
What problem does this paper attempt to address?