Petrological Evidence for Dehydration Melting of UHP Metamorphic Rocks during Continental Collision in the Sulu Orogen

CHEN Yixiang,ZHENG Yongfei
2013-01-01
Abstract:Anatexis of high-pressure (HP) and ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic rocks has great bearing on tectonothermal evolution of continental collision zones and crust-mantle interaction as well as crust recycling in orogenic belts (e.g., Hermann et al., 2001; Labrousse et al., 2011). Because even small fractions of melts can significantly reduce the rock strength (e.g., Rosenberg and Handy, 2005), the anatexis of UHP rocks at mantle depths can promote exhumation of deeply subducted continental slices along subduction channel toward shallow levels (e.g., Wallis et al., 2005; Labrousse et al., 2011; Zheng, 2012). Therefore, it is intriguing to elucidate the temporal-spatial relationships, P-T conditions and mechanisms of anatexis that occurred in various UHP metamorphic rocks. As the deeply subducted continental crust is generally old, cold and dry compared to the oceanic crust, fluidinduced arc magmatism during subduction does not develop above continental subduction zones (Zheng, 2012). Instead, synexhumation anatexis of UHP slices has been identified in many continental subduction zones, including Dabie-Sulu orogenic belt in east-central China (Zheng et al., 2011). While it is easy to identify large-scale anatexis of UHP metamorphic rocks by field occurrence of synexhumation and postcollisional graniticigneous rocks, it is hard to recognize small-scale anatexis at the scales of hand specimen and thin section. In such cases, microstructural analysis is a powerful tool to help identify the possible occurrence of crustal anatexis (e.g., Holness and Sawyer, 2008; Holness et al., 2011). The Dabie-Sulu orogenic belt contains one of the largest and best exposed UHP metamorphic terranes on Earth (e.g., Zheng et al., 2003, 2009). This study focuses on petrological evidence for anatexis of UHP quartzite, granitic gneiss and eclogite in the southwestern part of the Sulu orogen. 2 Petrological evidence for anatexis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?