Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effects of mixed probiotics on food allergy and the underlying mechanism.Methods:BALB/c mice on the 15 th day of pregnancy were randomly (random number table method) classified into the control group, food allergy model group and mixed probiotics group.Mice in the food allergy model and mixed pro-biotics group were subjected to ovalbumin (OVA) sensitization after birth, and those in the mixed probiotics group were then given probiotic solution by gavage from day 21 to day 35.Mice in control group were similarly given 9 g/L saline.Twenty-four hours after the last OVA sensitization, intestinal histopathological sections were prepared to observe intestinal pathological changes.Blood smears were prepared to detect eosinophil count.In addition, serum samples were collected to measure cytokine levels and OVA specific antibodies.The number of dendritic cells (DCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in mouse mesenteric lymph nodes was calculated.Differences among 3 groups were compared by the One- Way ANOVA or Kruskal- Wallis H test. Results:Compared with those of food allergy model group, diarrhea score, the ratio of eosinophils and serum levels of interleukin(IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, mast cell protease 1 (MCPT-1), and OVA specific antibodies IgE and IgG were significantly lower in mixed probiotics group[(2.00±0.71) points vs.(3.22±0.97) points, (2.28±1.61)% vs.(10.99±2.26)%, (413.68±22.81) ng/L vs.(708.78±27.66) ng/L, (36.64±3.74) ng/L vs.(46.05±4.95) ng/L, (201.37±65.61) ng/L vs.(495.22±96.66) ng/L, (31 924.15±1 177.77) ng/L vs.(36 175.77±618.29) ng/L, (9.10±8.08) ng/L vs.(19.69±0.84) ng/L, (30.50±8.81) ng/L vs.(190.32±6.40) ng/L], while IL-10 level was significantly higher[(164.12±3.88) ng/L vs.(123.90±7.31) ng/L] ( t=3.37, 8.72, 16.07, 3.90, 7.40, 7.95, 3.91, 44.00 and 7.76, respectively, all P<0.01). Compared with those of food allergy model group, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level on the surface of CD 103+ DCs and CD 103+ CD 80-CD 40-DCs, the proportion of Tregs in CD4 + T cells, and the level of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) on the surface of Tregs were significantly higher in mixed probiotics group[(75.59±0.45)% vs.(45.60±4.73)%, (67.56±1.87)% vs.(37.12±6.07)%, (8.24±0.69)% vs.(6.20±0.66)%, (11.25±3.12)% vs.(4.08±2.33)%]( t=7.88, 4.48, 3.63 and 3.71, all P<0.01). Conclusions:Mixed probiotics can alleviate the symptoms of food allergy and inflammatory response of young rats through mediating Tregs via the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.

Reduction of Bovine β-lactoglobulin Allergenicity via Bifidobacterium longum BBMN68 Modulated-dendritic Cells in Mice

Bifidobacterium longum BBMN68‐specific modulated dendritic cells alleviate allergic responses to bovine β‐lactoglobulin in mice

Bifidobacterium animalis KV9 and Lactobacillus vaginalis FN3 alleviated beta-lactoglobulin-induced allergy by modulating dendritic cells in mice

Bifidobacterium animalis KV9 and Lactobacillus vaginalis FN3 alleviated β-lactoglobulin-induced allergy by modulating dendritic cells in mice

Effect of whole peptidoglycan from lactobacilli on the imbalance of Th1/Th2 and Treg/Th17 in lymphocyte of bovine β-Lactoglobulin-sensitized mice in vitro

Modulatory Effect of Lactobacillus Acidophilus KLDS 1.0738 on Intestinal Short‐chain Fatty Acids Metabolism and GPR41/43 Expression in Β‐lactoglobulin–sensitized Mice

Suppressive effects of oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus on T helper-17 immune responses in a bovine β-lactoglobulin-sensitized mice model.

Effect of lactobacilli on production of Th1/Th2 cytokine and antibody in lymphocyte of bovine β-lactoglobulin-sensitized mice in vitro

Effect of Lactobacillus Acidophilus on Β-Lactoglobulin Induced Mouse Th1/Th2 Cell Imbalance

Immunomodulatory Effect of Lactobacillus Fermentum on Milk BLG-sensitized Mice Models

The Effect of Lactobacillus Actobacillus Peptidoglycan on Bovine Β-Lactoglobulin-sensitized Mice Via TLR2/NF-κB Pathway.

Effect of 3 lactobacilli on immunoregulation and intestinal microbiota in a β-lactoglobulin-induced allergic mouse model.

Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Bacillus subtilis B10 on intestinal ultrastructure modulation and mucosal immunity development mechanism in broiler chickens

Lactobacillus Acidophilus Regulates STAT3 and STAT5 Signaling in Bovine Β-Lg-sensitized Mice Model

Induction of Regulatory Dendritic Cells by Lactobacillus paracasei L9 Prevents Allergic Sensitization to Bovine β-Lactoglobulin in Mice.

Modulation effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus KLDS 1.0738 on gut microbiota and TLR4 expression in β-lactoglobulin-induced allergic mice model

Effects of Lactobacillus on the Differentiation of Intestinal Mucosa Immune Cells and the Composition of Gut Microbiota in Soybean-Sensitized Mice

Effect of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus LZ260E on Allergic Symptoms and Intestinal Microbiota in Β-Lactoglobulin–sensitized Mice

Protective effect of Bifidobacterium infantis CGMCC313-2 on ovalbumin-induced airway asthma and β-lactoglobulin-induced intestinal food allergy mouse models.

Mechanism of mixed probiotics relieves food allergy in infant mice through the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway

Probiotics SOD Inhibited Food Allergy Via Downregulation of STAT6-TIM4 Signaling on DCs.