Optimization of Engineering and Geological Barrier Parameters of Hazardous Waste Landfills by Sensitivity Analysis

XIANG Rui,XU Yaꎬ LIU,Jingcaiꎬ LIU,Yuqiangꎬ DONG Lu,LEI Guoyuan,HUANG Qifei
2020-01-01
Abstract:In order to optimize the engineering∕geological barrier parameters of groundwater pollution risk control in hazardous waste landfillꎬ based on the system framework and method of process model simulationꎬ parameter sensitivity analysis and parameter optimizationꎬ the influence and sensitivity of key parameters on the concentration of pollutants carried by groundwater percolate are analyzedꎬ and the value range and minimum technical parameter requirements are recommended based on the analysis results. The results show that: (1) The order of sensitivity of each parameter to groundwater pollution risk is the spacing of diversion branch pipe > the thickness of aquifer > the gradient of diversion layer > the permeability coefficient of natural liner > the permeability coefficient of diversion layer > the velocity of groundwater flow. (2) The risk increases sharply when the distance between the guide and drainage branches is more than 25 mꎬ the slope of the guide and drainage layer is less than 2%ꎬ the permeability coefficient of the guide and drainage layer is less than 0􀆰 0001 cm∕sꎬ and the permeability coefficient of the natural liner is more than 1×10 cm∕s. On the contraryꎬ when the spacing between branch pipes is less than 10 mꎬ the gradient of guide bed is more than 3%ꎬ the permeability coefficient of guide bed is more than 0􀆰 01 cm∕sꎬ and the permeability coefficient of natural liner is less than 5×10 cm∕sꎬ the risk control has no obvious influence. (3) The spacing between branch pipes is the lowest 25 mꎬ but it is not suitable to be less than 10 mꎬ and the gradient of guide layer is the lowest 2%ꎬ but not more than 3%ꎻ the permeability coefficient of guide layer is the lowest 0􀆰 01 cm∕sꎻ and the permeability 环 境 科 学 研 究 第 33 卷 coefficient of natural liner is the lowest 1􀆰 0 × 10 cm∕s. The research shows that the parameters given in the existing standards are reasonableꎬ but the range is wide. It should be determined with hydrogeological parameters and landfill parameters.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?