Combination Impact Of Axillary Lymph Node Status And Biological Subtypes On Prognosis And Breast Conserving Surgery In Locally-Invasive Breast Cancer: A Real-World Study Of A Chinese Population

Zhaoqing Fan,Yingjian He,Jinfeng Li,Tianfeng Wang,Yuntao Xie,Xinguang Wang,Xing Wang,Lize Wang,Tao Ouyang
2019-01-01
Abstract:The combination impact of axillary lymph node status and biological subtypes on prognosis of locally-invasive breast cancer and feasibility levels of breast conserving surgery have not been thoroughly examined. The current study collected 3,302 patients with histologically-confirmed primary invasive breast cancer undergoing curative surgery. Expression statuses of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), along with axillary lymph nodes status and follow-up information, were collected for all patients. Patients were divided into six subgroups, accordingto immunohistochemical results and axillary lymph nodes status, including G1-G6: G1 (LN+/Iuminal-like), G2 (LN+/basal-like), G3 (LN+/HER2+HR-), G4 (LN-/Iuminal-like), G5 (LN+/basal-like), and G6 (LN+/HER2+HR-) groups. Prognostic effects of the G subgroup were detected and its association with the feasibility of breast conserving surgery was explored. A total of 2,031 patients underwent mastectomy procedures (61.5%), while 1,271 (38.5%) underwent breast conserving surgery. There were 1,016 (30.8%), 223 (6.8%), 457 (13.8%), 1,002 (30.3%), 257 (7.8%), and 457 (10.5%) patients in G1 to G6 subgroups, respectively. The median follow-up time was 92 months (ranging from 3 to 187), while disease recurred in 387 patients (11.7%). The G subgroup was an independent factor for DDFS and DFS (both P<0.001) and the only independent factor for LRFS (P<0.001). The G subgroup was also significantly correlated with surgery type (P<0.001). Combination of axillary lymph node status and biological subtype was associated with multiple prognosis of primary breast cancer. Thus, it is a potential indicator for feasibility of breast conserving surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?