Abstract:Background Machine learning (ML)-based predictive models for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing non-cardiac surgery (NCS) have not been reported before. Methods Clinical data from 9171 consecutive adult patients with SCAD, who underwent NCS at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2013 and May 2023, were used to develop and validate the prediction models. MACEs were defined as all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke perioperatively. Compare various resampling and feature selection methods to deal with data imbalance. A traditional logistic regression (the Revised Cardiac Risk index, RCRI) and nine ML models (logistic regression, support vector machine, Gaussian Naive Bayes, random forest, GBDT, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost and best stacking ensemble model) were compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). The calibration was assessed using the calibration curve and the patients’ net benefit was measured by decision curve analysis (DCA). Models were tested via 5-fold cross-validation. Feature importance was interpreted using SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP). Results Among 9171 patients, 514 (5.6%) developed MACEs. The XGBoost performed best in terms of AUROC (0.898) and AUPRC (0.479),which were better than the RCRI of AUROC (0.716) and AUPRC (0.185), Delong test and Permutation test P<0.001, respectively. The calibration curve of XGBoost performance accurately predicted the risk of MACEs (brier score 0.040), the DCA results showed that the XGBoost had a high net benefit for predicting MACEs. The top-ranked stacking ensemble model consisting of CatBoost, GBDT, GNB, and LR proved to be the best, with an AUROC value of 0.894 (95% CI 0.860-0.928) and an AUPRC value of 0.485 (95% CI 0.383-0.587). Using the mean absolute SHAP values, we identified the top 20 important features. Conclusion The first ML-based perioperative MACEs prediction models for patients with SCAD were successfully developed and validated. High-risk patients for MACEs can be effectively identified and targeted interventions can be made to reduce the incidence of MACEs. Lay Summary We performed a retrospective machine learning classification study of MACEs in patients with SCAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery to develop and validate an optimal prediction model. In this study, we analyzed the data missing mechanism and identified the best missing data interpolation method, while applying appropriate resampling techniques and feature selection methods for data imbalance characteristics, and ultimately identified 24 preoperative features for building a machine learning predictive model. Eight independent machine learning prediction models and stacking ensemble models were built, and the models were evaluated comprehensively using ROC curve, PRC curve, calibration plots and DCA curve. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170331), Joint Funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20337), and grants from the Key Research and Development Plan of Zhejiang Province (2020C03017) ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Committee of the the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (No. of ethical approval: IIT20230114A). Written informed consent was waived owing to the nature of the retrospective study design and the collected data was managed in a de-identified form. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes * NCS : non-cardiac surgery SCAD : stable coronary artery disease MACEs : major adverse cardiovascular events MI : myocardial infarction HF : heart failure RCRI : Revised Cardiac Risk index ML : Machine learning AI : artificial intelligence ECG : electrocardiogram FAHZU : First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine TRIPOD : Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Models for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis STROBE : STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology ACC : American College of Cardiology AHA : American Heart Association ICD-10 : International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition BMI : Body Mass Index DOS : duration of surgery GA : general anesthesia AQW : abnormal Q waves ST-Ta : ST-T wave abnormalities LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction RWMA : regional wall motion abnormality LVDD : left ventricle diastolic dysfunction PH : pulmonary hypertension Hb : Hemoglobin FBG : Fasting blood glucose Scr : Creatinine ASA PS : American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status IR : imbalance ratio AUROC : area under the receiver operating characteristic curve AUPRC : area under the precision and recall curve SMOTE : Synthetic minority over-sampling technique ADASYN : adaptive synthetic ENN : Edited Nearest Neighbors XGBoost : eXtreme Gradient Boosting CFS : correlation-based feature selection RFE : recursive feature elimination SHAP : SHapley Additive exPlanation LightGBM : Light Gradient Boosting Machine RF : Random Forest LR : logistic regression SVM : support vector machine GNB : Gaussian Naïve Bayesian GBDT : gradient boosting decision tree CatBoost : categorical boosting ROC : receiver-operating characteristic PRC : curves and precision–recall curves DCA : decision curve analysis SD : standard deviation IQR : interquartile range KNN : k-Nearest Neighbor IHD : Ischemic heart disease FS : fractional shortening LVDs : left ventricular end systolic dimension eGFR : Estimated glomerular filtration rate TSP : Total serum protein ALB : Albumin ChE : Cholinesterase TB : Total bilirubin tCa : Total calcium FB : Fibrinogen VIF : variance inflation factor MCAR : missing completely at random MAR : missing at random MNAR : missing not at random

A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Early Phase Postoperative Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy

Machine Learning Models of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Prediction After Cardiac Surgery.

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy

A machine learning-based approach for the prediction of periprocedural myocardial infarction by using routine data

Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning

Predicting the Outcome of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Machine-Learning-Guided Scorecard

Machine Learning with Clinical and Intraoperative Biosignal Data for Predicting Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Risk Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Occurrence Within 6 Months After Coronary Revascularization: Machine Learning Study

Risk Factors of Cerebral Infarction and Myocardial Infarction after Carotid Endarterectomy Analyzed by Machine Learning.

Preoperative echocardiography predictive analytics for postinduction hypotension prediction

Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting

Risk Prediction for Non-cardiac Surgery Using the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram: An Explainable Deep Learning Approach

Machine learning-based prediction of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting-associated acute kidney injury

Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning

Long-term single-lead electrocardiogram monitoring to detect new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients after cardiac surgery

Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Retrospective Cohort Study

Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study

Machine learning-based predictive models for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Machine learning model based on RCA-PDCA nursing methods and differentiating factors to predict hypotension during cesarean section surgery

Predicting Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization Using Machine Learning

Muscle-related parameters-based machine learning model for predicting postinduction hypotension in patients undergoing colorectal tumor resection surgery