Imaging , Diagnosis , Prognosis Integrative Survival-Based Molecular Pro fi ling of Human Pancreatic Cancer

Timothy R. Donahue,Linh M. Tran,Reginald Hill,Yunfeng Li,Anne Kovochich,Joseph H. Calvopina,Sanjeet G. Patel,Nanping Wu,Antreas Hindoyan,James J. Farrell,Xinmin Li,David W. Dawson,Hong Wu
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: To carry out an integrative profile of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to identify prognosis-significant genes and their related pathways. Experimental Design: A concordant survival-based whole genome in silico array analysis of DNA copy number, andmRNAandmiRNAexpression in 25 early-stage PDACwas carried out. Anovel composite score simultaneously integrated gene expression with regulatory mechanisms to identify the signature genes with themost levels of prognosis-significant evidence. The predominant signaling pathways were determined via a pathway-based approach. Independent patient cohorts (n 1⁄4 148 and 42) were then used as in vitro validation of the array findings. Results: The composite score identified 171 genes in which expressions were able to define two prognosis subgroups (P 1⁄4 3.8e-5). Eighty-eight percent (151 of 171) of the genes were regulated by prognosis-significant miRNAs. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway and SRC signaling were densely populated by prognosis-significant genes and driven by genomic amplification of SRC and miRNA regulation of p85a and CBL. On tissue microarray validation (n 1⁄4 148), p85a protein expression was associated with improved survival for all patients (P 1⁄4 0.02), and activated P-SRC (Y418) was associated shorter survival for patients with low-grade histology tumors (P 1⁄4 0.04). Interacting P-SRC and p85a revealed that they define two distinct PDAC patient subgroups (P 1⁄4 0.0066). Furthering the importance of these pathways, CBL protein expression was associated with improved survival (P 1⁄4 0.03) on a separate cohort (n 1⁄4 42). Conclusions: These pathways and related genes may represent putative clinical biomarkers and possible targets of individualized therapy in the distinct patient subgroups they define. Clin Cancer Res; 18(5); 1352–63. 2012 AACR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?