ISIJ International, Vol. 47 (2007), No. 6, pp. 883–889

Nicole Ellen STANFORD,Ke CHEN,Druce Patrick DUNNE,Xue-Jun JIN
2007-01-01
Abstract:The shape memory properties of the Fe–Mn–Si-based alloy system are well documented. The parent phase in these alloys is face centred cubic (FCC) austenite, and deformation produces a hexagonal (HCP) martensite known as e . The transformation from FCC to HCP occurs by the formation and overlap of stacking faults. The stress-induced e can be reversed to the parent phase by heating, and this imparts the shape memory effect (SME). To maximise the reversible strain, e martensite should form in preference to slip in response to applied stress. Therefore, material parameters that promote e formation are likely to enhance the SME. Because e forms by the proliferation of stacking faults, it has been suggested that lowering the stacking fault energy (SFE) promotes the formation of e martensite. For this reason, it is expected that alloying additions that reduce the SFE of Fe–Mn–Si-based alloys will enhance the shape recovery through increased e formation. Another property of the austenite that is known to affect e formation is the Neél temperature (TN). The TN is the transition temperature between the higher temperature paramagnetic and the lower temperature antiferromagnetic states of the austenite. Antiferromagnetism is claimed to stabilise the austenite through ordering, hindering the formation of martensite, thereby reducing the SME. It is generally considered that the TN must be below the MS for optimum shape recovery. Both the SFE and the Neél temperature can be manipulated through alloying, and there are a number of works that investigate the effect of substitutional alloying of elements such as Ni and Cr on the SME e.g. Refs. 4) and 7). However, the effect of carbon and nitrogen on SME has received less attention. These two interstitials have similar austenite stabilizing properties, and are both powerful austenite strengtheners. The effects of C and N on this alloy system have usually been studied with respect to their austenite strengthening capabilities, and as yet there has not been an integrated investigation that considers the effects of SFE, TN and composition on the SME. Moreover, of the available literature, there is no consensus as to whether interstitial elements have a beneficial or detrimental effect on SME. It is a major aim of this paper to investigate the effect of interstitial elements on SME in the Fe–Mn–Si-based system, taking into consideration the impact of TN and SFE on the measured shape recovery. In addition to interstitial alloying, alloys have also been produced in which 5% of the Mn content has been replaced by either Cr or Ni. These additions alter both TN and SFE, and provide benchmark alloys with which to compare the nitrogenand carbon-containing alloys.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?