Cross-correlation Between X-ray and Optical/near-Infrared Background Intensity Fluctuations

Ketron Mitchell-Wynne,Asantha Cooray,Yongquan Xue,Bin Luo,William Brandt,Anton Koekemoer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/104
IF: 5.521
2016-01-01
The Astrophysical Journal
Abstract:Angular power spectra of optical and infrared background anisotropies at wavelengths between 0.5 and 5 mu m are a useful probe of faint sources present during reionization, in addition to faint galaxies and diffuse signals at low redshift. The cross-correlation of these fluctuations with backgrounds at other wavelengths can be used to separate some of these signals. A previous study on the cross-correlation between X-ray and Spitzer fluctuations at 3.6 mu m and 4.5 mu m has been interpreted as evidence for direct collapse black holes present at z > 12. Here we return to this cross-correlation and study its wavelength dependence from 0.5 to 4.5 mu m using Hubble and Spitzer data in combination with a subset of the 4 Ms Chandra observations in GOODS-S/ECDFS. Our study involves five Hubble bands at 0.6, 0.7, 0.85, 1.25, and 1.6 mu m, and two Spitzer-IRAC bands at 3.6 mu m and 4.5 mu m. We confirm the previously seen cross-correlation between 3.6 mu m ( 4.5 mu m) and X-rays with 3.7 sigma (4.2 sigma) and 2.7 sigma (3.7s sigma) detections in the soft [0.5-2] keV and hard [2-8] keV X-ray bands, respectively, at angular scales above 20 arcsec. The cross-correlation of X-rays with Hubble is largely anticorrelated, ranging between the levels of 1.4 sigma-3.5 sigma for all the Hubble and X-ray bands. This lack of correlation in the shorter optical/NIR bands implies the sources responsible for the cosmic infrared background at 3.6 and 4.5 mu m are at least partly dissimilar to those at 1.6 mu m and shorter.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?