Abstract:Motivation Strategies to develop manufacturing industry are the subject of lively debate over whether to follow or defy national comparative advantage. Electric vehicles (EVs), a major change for automobile manufacturers, are no exception. Despite the US government's promotion of global integration to activate the semi‐invisible hand of market forces, neither traditional Detroit automakers nor new firms, even with government grants or loans, were able to launch EVs on the world market promptly, with the notable exception of Tesla. In China, the government helped dozens of domestic electric vehicle manufacturers enter the market through formidable government subsidies. However, none of China's manufacturers, other than Wuling, were able to surpass Tesla in sales in China. The rapid growth of Tesla and Wuling without relying heavily on government protection and subsidies raises the question of whether their success can be attributed to other forms of state intervention. Purpose What policies and strategies enable manufacturers to develop and market a new technology, such as EVs? What can we learn by comparing the experiences of US and Chinese vehicle manufacturers? We consider these questions and what the implications are for debates about industrial development strategy. Methods and approach We compare four carmaking firms—GM, Tesla, BYD, and Wuling—their business strategies and their interactions with the US and Chinese states. We draw on company reports, government documents, and press reports. Findings Both China and the US employed semi‐developmentalist, semi‐neoliberal policies to promote the manufacture of EVs. The US subsidized research and development in its automobile industry and provided incentives to consumers. It has subsequently moved to lending to the most promising firms for EV production. China, in contrast, has selectively subsidized EV firms all the way from development to marketing. Subsidies from the US government have been steady: they are expected to stay this way in the near term. However, the fastest‐growing carmakers have used outward foreign direct investment to gain competitive advantage. China's subsidies, on the other hand, have been unstable: linked to the performance of the target firms. The higher the firm's profit, the lower the subsidies and vice versa. China has been careful with subsidies to prevent rent seeking and moral hazard. Neither following nor defying comparative advantage explains the strategies followed by the four firms: comparative advantage considerations have been tempered by the possibilities of foreign investment. Policy implications The results imply that traditional developmental strategies have resorted to inward foreign direct investment in high‐income countries as a means to learn technologies and outward foreign direct investment in low‐ and medium‐income countries as a way to reduce production costs, but have missed the comparative advantage of outward and inward foreign direct investment, and strategic mixes of these, when developing and diffusing radical innovation like EVs.

Comparative analysis on the development of electric vehicle technologies in China and USA: patent view

Research on the Development of pure electric vehicle power battery Technology based on patent analysis

Comparative Analysis of Chinese and US New Energy Vehicle Markets and Development Strategies of Chinese New Energy Enterprises

Analysis of challenges and opportunities in the development of new energy vehicle battery industry from the perspective of patents

Research on the impact of Tesla’s technology patent opening on China’s new energy vehicle industry

Comparative Analysis of Existing Policies in the Electric Vehicle Industry in China and the United States

Comparative Analysis of Research on the Development of New Energy Vehicles between China and the United States

Plug-in electric vehicles in China and the USA: a technology and market comparison

Is China's industrial policy effective? An empirical study of the new energy vehicles industry

Review of Electric Vehicle Policies in China: Content Summary and Effect Analysis

Comparative Analysis of Chinese New Energy Vehicle Enterprises

Core Technologies Identification of China’s New Energy Vehicles Based on Patent Analysis

Comparison Of the Electric Vehicle Industry in China and The United States - In Terms of Sales Volume, Policies, And Technology

Developing electric vehicles in China and the United States: Revisiting debates on industrial strategy

Comparative Analysis of Technical Route and Market Development for Light-Duty PHEV in China and the US

Comparing nanotechnology landscapes in the US and China: a patent analysis perspective

New Entrants Versus Establishers in China and US Electric Vehicle Marketplace: a Comparative Analysis

Prospects of battery assembly for electric vehicles based on patent analysis

The Current Dilemma and Future Path of China’s Electric Vehicles

Review of Electric Vehicle Technologies Progress and Development Prospect in China

Comparative analysis of intelligent connected vehicle industry in China, United States and European Union from technology lifecycle perspective