Abstract:Motivation Strategies to develop manufacturing industry are the subject of lively debate over whether to follow or defy national comparative advantage. Electric vehicles (EVs), a major change for automobile manufacturers, are no exception. Despite the US government's promotion of global integration to activate the semi‐invisible hand of market forces, neither traditional Detroit automakers nor new firms, even with government grants or loans, were able to launch EVs on the world market promptly, with the notable exception of Tesla. In China, the government helped dozens of domestic electric vehicle manufacturers enter the market through formidable government subsidies. However, none of China's manufacturers, other than Wuling, were able to surpass Tesla in sales in China. The rapid growth of Tesla and Wuling without relying heavily on government protection and subsidies raises the question of whether their success can be attributed to other forms of state intervention. Purpose What policies and strategies enable manufacturers to develop and market a new technology, such as EVs? What can we learn by comparing the experiences of US and Chinese vehicle manufacturers? We consider these questions and what the implications are for debates about industrial development strategy. Methods and approach We compare four carmaking firms—GM, Tesla, BYD, and Wuling—their business strategies and their interactions with the US and Chinese states. We draw on company reports, government documents, and press reports. Findings Both China and the US employed semi‐developmentalist, semi‐neoliberal policies to promote the manufacture of EVs. The US subsidized research and development in its automobile industry and provided incentives to consumers. It has subsequently moved to lending to the most promising firms for EV production. China, in contrast, has selectively subsidized EV firms all the way from development to marketing. Subsidies from the US government have been steady: they are expected to stay this way in the near term. However, the fastest‐growing carmakers have used outward foreign direct investment to gain competitive advantage. China's subsidies, on the other hand, have been unstable: linked to the performance of the target firms. The higher the firm's profit, the lower the subsidies and vice versa. China has been careful with subsidies to prevent rent seeking and moral hazard. Neither following nor defying comparative advantage explains the strategies followed by the four firms: comparative advantage considerations have been tempered by the possibilities of foreign investment. Policy implications The results imply that traditional developmental strategies have resorted to inward foreign direct investment in high‐income countries as a means to learn technologies and outward foreign direct investment in low‐ and medium‐income countries as a way to reduce production costs, but have missed the comparative advantage of outward and inward foreign direct investment, and strategic mixes of these, when developing and diffusing radical innovation like EVs.

Business Model Helps New Entrants Leading:the Case of Electric Vehicle Industry

New Entrants Versus Establishers in China and US Electric Vehicle Marketplace: a Comparative Analysis

Innovation Model Analysis of New Energy Vehicles: Taking Toyota, Tesla and BYD as an Example

Competitive Strategies of New Energy Vehicle Enterprises: Taking BYD as an Example

Exploring a Sustainable Business Routing for China’s New Energy Vehicles: BYD as an Example

Cross-market innovation: the dynamics of latecomer catching-up model from new Chinese electric vehicle OEMs

The electric vehicle and renewable energy: Changes in boundary conditions that enhance business model innovations

Business innovation and government regulation for the promotion of electric vehicle use: lessons from Shenzhen, China

Catching Up in a Bidirectional Way: Evidence from Chinese Electric Automotive Industry Leader BYD

The innovations and implications of the global business models for electric vehicles

The Marketing and Business Mode of New Energy Vehicle Industry: Evidence from BYD

Research on the Influence of New Energy Vehicles Industry Eco-business Model on Brand Competitiveness

Analysis of the Business Models of the Intelligent and Connected Vehicle Industry

The Mechanism and Path of the Cross-Market Innovation for Catching-Up Firms: A Case Study on New Chinese Electric Vehicle OEMs

Developing electric vehicles in China and the United States: Revisiting debates on industrial strategy

Organizing Business Ecosystems in Emerging Electric Vehicle Industry: Structure, Mechanism, and Integrated Configuration

The Study on the Business Model System of Electric Vehicles

Analysis of the Core Competitive Advantage of the Auto Industry: A Case of Tesla’ s Business Model

The Study of Re-construction Method of EV Business Model based on Value Chain Analysis

Research on the Impact of High-End Ev Sales Business Model on Brand Competitiveness

Business Model of Technology-Based New Firms - A Case Study of Lianlian Technology