Abstract:Introduction This study evaluates the feasibility of a survivor‐centric, navigator‐driven, and technology‐enabled platform supporting survivors and care partners in post‐stroke recovery. We hypothesize that post‐stroke navigation can favorably impact stroke recovery through monitoring medical and behavioral health factors, social needs assessment and support, curated educational content, evidence‐based interventions, and clinical guidance. Methods An app‐based, virtual care model was used to increase survivor quality of life and improve outcomes for stroke survivors. This mixed methods study utilizes both focus group feedback, survey, and patient‐reported outcomes data along with digital engagement. Participants (n=40) were facilitated by a clinical navigator (occupational therapist or licensed clinical social worker) through understanding lived experiences and health‐related motivators. Stroke survivors and their care partners, if they have one, were referred from one of four partner hospitals by the primary stroke team during the pilot program (starting July 2022) prior to their discharge. The Navigators worked through phone, messaging, and video calls with the stroke survivor and their care partner who had shared access within the app but had separate profiles. The duration of participation was a median of 12 weeks but could be as short as 2 weeks based on individual needs including post‐stroke impairments, social determinants of health, resource needs, education and health literacy, risk factors and lifestyle management, as well as mental health support. The average participant had 9 Navigator touchpoints totaling 6‐8 hours over the 12 weeks. Results In this feasibility study, clinician‐assessed mRS scores were captured at 90 days following hospital discharge for 95% of participants. This is similar to the results recently reported for another clinician‐supported, app‐based post‐acute platform in Spain. Significant functional improvement was seen over time, with 84% achieving mRS scores of 0‐2 at 90 days, compared to 60% of participants at the time of enrollment. 88% of enrollees completed the validated Take Charge Intervention. The 30‐ and 90‐day all‐cause readmission rates for survivors were 6% and 12%, respectively. This is superior to recent publications reporting 30‐day unplanned readmission rates after stroke ranging from 8.7%‐12.5%, and 90‐day readmissions ranging from 18.9% to 20.7%. Nearly all (96%) of the stroke survivors that participated in the program reported adherence to their medications, compared to a national average of 64%. At 90 days, 90% of enrollees had completed a neurology follow‐up visit. Among the 15% of participants who did not have a primary care physician (PCP) prior to their stroke, the Navigators were able to assist in establishing care with a PCP for all of them. The demographics reflect typical stroke populations: Ten percent of the enrollees were on Medicaid or uninsured at the time of their stroke, more than half were non‐white, and 20% had five or more needs related to social determinants of health. Conclusion This feasibility study demonstrates that a tech‐enabled healthcare services program can engage and impact the outcomes of individuals and care partners during stroke recovery.

Abstract TP48: Rebuilding Sustainable Stroke Support Group: Strategies and Impact

Abstract TP59: Cultivating Stroke Nurse Champions Through Shared Governance

Abstract WP105: Outcomes From the 1st 100 Stroke Survivors Served by a Novel Tech-Enabled Post-Acute Clinical Service

Abstract TP65: Mastering the Art of Herding Cats: Unraveling the Methods of Effective Communication in a Growing Stroke Program

Abstract TP76: Step by Step: Implementing Post-Acute Stroke Standards

Abstract WP54: Design and Preliminary Results on an Educational Intervention to Foster Stroke Coordinator Engagement, Knowledge, and Job Satisfaction

Abstract WP57: Who Needs to Compete When You Can Collaborate? Celebrating 25 Years of Successful Stroke Care

Abstract 9525: Changes in Managing Post-Stroke Challenges After Receiving a Self-Management Programme: A Qualitative Study

Abstract NS4: Can a Remote Telehealth-Based Program Support Survivors With Varying Social Needs Post-Stroke?

Abstract T MP99: Your Role as Stroke Coordinator, from Surviving to Thriving

Abstract 33: An Innovative Digital Health Approach to Enhance Patient Engagement in Stroke Care

Abstract 27: Stroke Camp Offers Emotional and Physical Relief for Stroke Caregivers

Abstract WMP28: Developing a New Hospital Into a Primary Stroke Center in Just Over a Year

Abstract TP56: Addressing Written Stroke Education and Post-Discharge Prescription Filling for Ischemic Stroke Survivors

Experiences of adults with stroke attending a peer-led peer-support group

Abstract HUP4: Can A Remote Telehealth-based Program Support Survivors With Varying Social Needs Post-stroke?

Abstract TP409: Continuous Quality Improvement Implementation Across a Large Stroke Network of Affiliated Rural Hospitals

Abstract NS6: Connecting the Dots; a Pharmacist-Led Care Transition Model for Stroke Patients Post-Discharge

Abstract WP56: Neuroscience Nurse Navigator a New Compass in Continuation of Care Among Stroke Populations

Abstract 079: Preliminary Outcomes of a Survivor‐Centric Digital Platform in Stroke Recovery

Abstract WP53: Bringing Comprehensive Stroke Care Home: Supporting Early Supported Discharge