Finite Element Material Point Method for Intensive Impact Loading

Xiong Zhang,Yanping Lian,Yan Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-098X.2016.18.095

2016-01-01

Abstract:Materials and structures show strong nonlinearities under intensive impact loading, which pose great challenges on numerical analysis. It is not an easy task for mesh-based methods such as finite element method (FEM) to solve such problems effectively. The material point method (MPM) has both the advantages of Lagrangian method and Eulerian method. No mesh distortion exists, and history variables and the material interface can be easily traced in MPM. So MPM is very appropriate for intensive impact problems. But the accuracy and the efficiency of MPM for small deformation problems are lower than those of explicit FEM. The characteristic lengths of different components in the reinforced concrete (RC) problems are very different, which also poses challenges on MPM. The combined finite element material point method, which is proposed by the research group, is introduced in this report. MPM theory is briefly investigated, and the similarity between MPM and FEM is the foundation of the combination methods. The coupled finite element material point method (CFEMP), the adaptive finite element material point method (AFEMP), and the hybrid finite element material point method (HFEMP) are introduced sequentially. The basic ideas and the theories of the above methods are elaborated, and numerical examples of intensive impact problems such as perforation are given. The results show advantages in accuracy and efficiency over standard MPM. CFEMP employs FEM for small deformation objects and MPM for large deformation objects. Different discretization regions are coupled through contact algorithms. The coupling process is explained in detail. AFEMP employs FEM for the whole domain initially and automatically converts the elements before distortion or failure to material points. The conversion algorithm is introduced thoroughly, and interactions and contacts between different discretization regions are stated as well. HFEMP focuses on RC problems. The bar elements are used for the reinforcement and the material points are used for the concrete. The interaction between different discretization and the deformation consistency are realized through the background mesh. The above methods have both the advantages of FEM and MPM and overcome their shortcomings, so they are more effective in simulating intensive impact problems. A unified framework of FEM and MPM is established. The above methods are significant to design and analysis of practical problems.