Abstract:Importance: Most regulated medical devices enter the US market via the 510(k) regulatory submission pathway, wherein manufacturers demonstrate that applicant devices are "substantially equivalent" to 1 or more "predicate" devices (legally marketed medical devices with similar intended use). Most recalled medical devices are 510(k) devices. Objective: To examine the association between characteristics of predicate medical devices and recall probability for 510(k) devices. Design, setting, and participants: In this exploratory cross-sectional analysis of medical devices cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2003 and 2018 via the 510(k) regulatory submission pathway, linear probability models were used to examine associations between a 510(k) device's recall status and characteristics of its predicate medical devices. Public documents for the 510(k) medical devices were collected using FDA databases. A text extraction algorithm was applied to identify predicate medical devices cited in 510(k) regulatory submissions. Algorithm-derived metadata were combined with 2003-2020 FDA recall data. Exposures: Citation of predicate medical devices with certain characteristics in 510(k) regulatory submissions, including the total number of predicate medical devices cited by the applicant device, the age of the predicate medical devices, the lack of similarity of the predicate medical devices to the applicant device, and the recall status of the predicate medical devices. Main outcomes and measures: Class I or class II recall of a 510(k) medical device between its FDA regulatory clearance date and December 31, 2020. Results: The sample included 35 176 medical devices, of which 4007 (11.4%) were recalled. The applicant devices cited a mean of 2.6 predicate medical devices, with mean ages of 3.6 years and 7.4 years for the newest and oldest, respectively, predicate medical devices. Of the applicant devices, 93.9% cited predicate medical devices with no ongoing recalls, 4.3% cited predicate medical devices with 1 ongoing class I or class II recall, 1.0% cited predicate medical devices with 2 ongoing recalls, and 0.8% cited predicate medical devices with 3 or more ongoing recalls. Applicant devices citing predicate medical devices with 3 or more ongoing recalls were significantly associated with a 9.31-percentage-point increase (95% CI, 2.84-15.77 percentage points) in recall probability compared with devices without ongoing recalls of predicate medical devices, or an 81.2% increase in recall probability relative to the mean recall probability. A 1-SD increase in the total number of predicate medical devices cited by the applicant device was significantly associated with a 1.25-percentage-point increase (95% CI, 0.62-1.87 percentage points) in recall probability, or an 11.0% increase in recall probability relative to the mean recall probability. A 1-SD increase in the newest age of a predicate medical device was significantly associated with a 0.78-percentage-point decrease (95% CI, 1.29-0.30 percentage points) in recall probability, or a 6.8% decrease in recall probability relative to the mean recall probability. Conclusions and relevance: This exploratory cross-sectional study of 510(k) medical devices cleared by the FDA between 2003 and 2018 demonstrated significant associations between 510(k) submission characteristics and recalls of medical devices. Further research is needed to understand the implications of these associations.

Analysis of FDA Neuromodulation Device Recall in 2006-2015

Class I Recalls of Cardiovascular Devices Between 2013 and 2022 : A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker

A Comprehensive Analysis of Class I Medical Device Recalls: Unveiling Patterns, Causes and Global Impacts

Risk of Recall Among Medical Devices Undergoing US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance and Premarket Approval, 2008-2017

Association Between Regulatory Submission Characteristics and Recalls of Medical Devices Receiving 510(k) Clearance

Medical Device Recalls and the FDA Approval Process

Analysis of Clinical Application of Magnetic Compatible Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device in a Chinese Population

Study of Software-Related Causes in the FDA Medical Device Recalls

Recall Rates of Total Knee Arthroplasty Devices Are Dependent on the FDA Approval Process

A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Medical Device Recall by the Food and Drug Administration

Error Types and Associations of Clinically Significant Events Within Food and Drug Administration Recalls of Linear Accelerators and Related Products

What Electrophysiologists Should Know about Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Recalls

Cardiac device creativity and innovation under constraints: Exploring trends from the food and drug administration's device clearances and recalls

Indication-based Analysis of Patient Outcomes Following Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Security and privacy qualities of medical devices: an analysis of FDA postmarket surveillance

Navigating the Landscape of Medical Device Advisories: A Special Report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee

Analysis of reasons for medical malpractice litigation due to spinal cord stimulator

An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database for MAGnetic Expansion Control Spinal Rods

A retrospective regulatory analysis of FDA recalls carried out by pharmaceutical companies from 2012 to 2023

Drug Recall Monitoring and Trend Analysis: A Multidimensional Study