Corporate Governance Reform,Product Market Competition and Firm Value

Yao Lu,Xinzheng Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13948/j.cnki.hgzlyj.2016.04.006
2016-01-01
Abstract:Based on the analyses on the three different kinds of agency problems (“empire-building”,“enjoying quiet life” and “stealing”) , with the differences-in-differences approach and propensity-score matching approach,this paper estimates the impact of the corporate governance reform ( CGR) enacted in 2001 in China on firm value. The results show that the positive impact of the CGR on firm value is weaker when firms with more state ownership. But the impact of the CGR on firms with state ownership in more competitive product market is greater than the firms in less competitive product market. These findings suggest that the traditional internal corporate governance mechanisms covered by the CGR could be more effective for solving the agency problem of “empire-building” and “stealing”,but less effective for solving the agency problem of“enjoying quiet-life”. Since the agency problem of “enjoying quiet-life” is more likely to occur in firms with state ownership,the potential positive impact of CGR on firm value will be lower for firms with state ownership. In addition, since product market competition is considered as an important mechanism for eliminating the“enjoy quiet-life” problem,strengthening product market competition may enhance the efficiency of the impact of the CGR on enhancing state-owned enterprises’ firm value.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?