Generation of twin-Fock states for precision measurement beyond the standard quantum limit

Tey,MK,You,L
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.67.20181029
IF: 0.906
2018-01-01
Acta Physica Sinica
Abstract:The highest precision achievable for a two-mode (two-path) classical interferometer is bounded by 1/root N (with N being the number of particles participating in the measurement process). This bound is called the classical limit or the standard quantum limit. It is possible to beat this limit by introducing quantum entanglement among the particles such that quantum projection noise from different particles cancels out. Twin-Fock state is one type of such entangled states. It is made up of indistinguishable bosons equally distributed in two orthogonal modes (exactly half (N/2) in each mode). In the past, either through optical spontaneous parametric-down-conversion or through quantum-gate operations on trapped ions, twin-Fock states consisting of no more than 10 photons or ions have been realized. In recent years, twin-Fock states made up of a few thousand atoms have been generated using spin-mixing dynamics in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). However, these twin-Fock states exhibit huge fluctuation in particle numbers, thereby limiting their potential applications. We recently generated twin-Fock states of about 11000 atoms in a deterministic manner by driving a spin-1 BEC through quantum critical points (QCPs) slowly. Even though substantial excitations occur while crossing the QCP regions during the drive, this method is capable of generating highly entangled twin-Fock states because of the very different structures of the system's low-lying eigenstates across the QCPs. The samples we prepare feature a number squeezing of 10.7 +/- 0.6 decibels and a normalized collective spin length of 0.99 +/- 0.01. Together, they infer a minimum entanglement cluster (or entanglement breadth) of 910 atoms. This article introduces the background and advancement of this research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?