Pōniuā‘ena: A Luminous Z = 7.5 Quasar Hosting a 1.5 Billion Solar Mass Black Hole

Jinyi Yang,Feige Wang,Xiaohui Fan,Joseph F. Hennawi,Frederick B. Davies,Minghao Yue,Eduardo Banados,Xue-Bing Wu,Bram Venemans,Aaron J. Barth,Fuyan Bian,Konstantina Boutsia,Roberto Decarli,Emanuele Paolo Farina,Richard Green,Linhua Jiang,Jiang-Tao Li,Chiara Mazzucchelli,Fabian Walter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab9c26
2020-01-01
Abstract:We report the discovery of a luminous quasar, J1007+2115 at z = 7.515 ("Poniua'ena"), from our wide-field reionization-era quasar survey. J1007+2115 is the second quasar now known at z > 7.5, deep into the reionization epoch. The quasar is powered by a (1.5 +/- 0.2) x 10(9) M-circle dot supermassive black hole (SMBH), based on its broad Mg II emission-line profile from Gemini and Keck near-IR spectroscopy. The SMBH in J1007+2115 is twice as massive as that in quasar J1342+0928 at z = 7.54, the current quasar redshift record holder. The existence of such a massive SMBH just 700 million years after the Big Bang significantly challenges models of the earliest SMBH growth. Model assumptions of Eddington-limited accretion and a radiative efficiency of 0.1 require a seed black hole of greater than or similar to 10(4) M-circle dot at z = 30. This requirement suggests either a massive black hole seed as a result of direct collapse or earlier periods of rapid black hole growth with hyper-Eddington accretion and/or a low radiative efficiency. We measure the damping wing signature imprinted by neutral hydrogen absorption in the intergalactic medium (IGM) on J1007+2115' s Ly alpha line profile, and find that it is weaker than that of J1342+0928 and two other z greater than or similar to 7 quasars. We estimate an IGM volume-averaged neutral fraction = 0.39(-0.13)(+0.22). This range of values suggests a patchy reionization history toward different IGM sightlines. We detect the 158 mu m [C II] emission line in J1007+2115 with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array; this line centroid yields a systemic redshift of z = 7.5149 +/- 0.0004 and indicates a star formation rate of similar to 210 M-circle dot yr(-1) in its host galaxy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?