Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Multiple reports suggest that laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is technically feasible, safe, and effective in treating a variety of gynecological disease processes. The study purpose was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel robotic single-site platform (R-LESS) for the surgical treatment of benign and malignant gynecological conditions.STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, prospective analysis of 40 women treated with R-LESS on the gynecology and gynecological oncology services from June 2013 through March 2014. Women undergoing hysterectomy or adnexal surgery for either a benign or malignant gynecological condition were offered robotic single-site surgery during the study period of June 1, 2013, through April 1, 2014. Patients underwent surgery through a single 2.5-3.0 cm umbilical incision with a multichannel port and utilizing the da Vinci robotic single-site platform. Two surgeons with extensive laparoendoscopic single-site experience participated.RESULTS: Forty patients had R-LESS performed. Procedures included total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, excision of endometriosis, and a combined case of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and cholecystectomy. Median age and body mass index were 42 years and 28.2 kg/m(2), respectively. Median operating time, defined as the interval between incision start to closure, was 134 minutes (range, 84-311 minutes). Median vaginal cuff closure was 21 minutes (range, 9-77 minutes). Overall, there appeared to be a linear relationship between vaginal cuff closure time, console time, and operating time with number of cases performed. Procedures were successfully performed via R-LESS in 92.5% of cases; 2 cases required 1 additional port and there was 1 conversion to traditional multiport robotic surgery. There was 1 major postoperative complication (2.5%) and 1 readmission (2.5%). After a median follow-up period of 230 days (range, 61-256), there have been no postoperative hernias diagnosed.CONCLUSION: We present one of the first series of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of various gynecological conditions. When performed by experienced minimally invasive surgeons, R-LESS is feasible and safe in select patients. Further studies are needed to better define the ideal gynecological procedures to perform using robotic single-site surgery and to assess the benefits and costs of R-LESS compared with multiport robotic and conventional laparoscopic approaches.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Gynecology: Preliminary Experience at a Single Institution.

Long-term outcomes of vulvar or vaginal cancer patients undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy

Vaginal-assisted Gasless Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Radical Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer: a Retrospective Pilot Study

Endoscopic-assisted Small Incision Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Vulvar Carcinoma

Laparoendoscopic Single-site Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Closure and without Uterine Manipulator for FIGO IB1 Cervical Cancer

Superiority of Indocyanine Green-Enhanced Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Imaging for Laparoscopic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) over Open Inguinal Block Dissection: a Retrospective Study

Laparoscopic Local Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: Description of a Novel Technique.

Laparoendoscopic Single Site Myomectomy: Without the Use of a Single Port Access Device

Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique

Laparoscopic treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: benefits of sentinel lymph node mapping and impact on lower extremity lymphedema

Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery:initial experience

Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study

Surgical outcomes and morbidity in open and videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer: A systematic review and metanalysis"

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicentre Lateral Node Study in China.

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy treated patients with gynecological malignancies]

Medial Inguino-Femoral Lymphadenectomy for Vulvar Cancer: An Approach to Decrease Lymphedema without Compromising Survival

Improvements and challenges in intraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: The novel "tent-pitching" antegrade approach and vascular anatomical variations in the para-aortic region

[Clinical Appraisal of Laparoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy with Preservation of the Great Saphenous Vein Through Subcutaneous Approach Via Umbilical Cord for the Treatment of Penile Carcinoma: Report of 27 Cases].

Short‐term and Long‐term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle‐low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Lateral Node Study in China

Comparison of different surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer