Abstract:Accurately identifying the boundary of urban clusters is a crucial aspect of studying the development of urban agglomerations. This process is essential for comprehending and optimizing smart and compact urban development. Existing studies often rely on a single category of data, which can result in coarse identification boundaries, insufficient detail accuracy, and slight discrepancies between the coverage and the actual conditions. To accurately identify the extent of urban clusters, this study proposes and compares the results of three methods for identifying dense urban areas of three major agglomerations in China: Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area. The study then integrates the results of these methods to obtain a more effective identification approach. The social economic method involved extracting a density threshold based on the fused nuclear density of socio-economic vitality data, including population, GDP, and POI, while the remote sensing method evaluated feature indices based on remote sensing images, including the density index, continuity index, gradient index, and development index. The traffic network method utilizes land transportation networks and travelling speeds to identify the minimum cost path and delineate the boundary by 20–30 min isochronous circles. The results obtained from the three methods were combined, and hotspots were identified using GIS overlay analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis. This method integrates the multi-layered information from the previous three methods, which more comprehensively reflects the characteristics and morphology of urban clusters. Finally, the accuracy of each identification result is verified and compared. The results reveal that the average overall accuracy (OA) of the three areas delineated by the first three methods are 57.49%, 30.88%, and 33.74%, respectively. Furthermore, the average Kappa coefficients of these areas are 0.4795, 0.2609, and 0.2770, respectively. After performing data fusion, the resulting average overall accuracy (OA) was 85.34%, and the average Kappa coefficient was 0.7394. These findings suggest that the data fusion method can effectively delineate dense urban areas with greater accuracy than the previous three methods. Additionally, this method can accurately reflect the scope of urban clusters by depicting their overall boundary contour and the distribution of internal details in a more scientific manner. The study proposes a feasible method and path for the identification of urban clusters. It can serve as a starting point for formulating spatial planning policies for urban agglomerations, aiding in precise and scientific control of boundary growth. This can promote the rational allocation of resources and optimization of spatial structure by providing a reliable reference for the optimization of urban agglomeration space and the development of regional spatial policies.

Identifying and Evaluating Urban Centers for the Whole China Using Open Data

A New Approach for Detecting Urban Centers and Their Spatial Structure with Nighttime Light Remote Sensing

Rethinking the Identification of Urban Centers from the Perspective of Function Distribution: A Framework Based on Point-of-Interest Data

Understanding Urban China with Open Data

A topology-based approach to identifying urban centers in America using multi-source geospatial big data

Using Nighttime Light Data and POI Big Data to Detect the Urban Centers of Hangzhou

Portraying Urban Landscape: A Quantitative Analysis System Applied in Fifteen Metropolises in China

Study on Beijing Urban Center and Its Spatial Structure Based on Multi-Source Data

Mapping Block-Level Urban Areas For All Chinese Cities

Identification of Urban Functional Areas and Urban Spatial Structure Analysis by Fusing Multi-Source Data Features: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China

A nonparametric approach for detecting urban polycentric spatial structure in China using remote sensing nighttime light and point of interest data

Evaluating and Optimizing the Functional Composition of Community Centres: a Data-Informed Approach Assisting 15-Minute Community Life Circle

Multi-source Data-driven Identification of Urban Functional Areas: A Case of Shenyang, China

Quantitative Analysis of Spatial Heterogeneity and Driving Forces of the Urban Spatial Structure's Development Level Based on Multi-Source Big Data: A Case Study of Beijing, China

Understanding Uneven Urban Expansion with Natural Cities Using Open Data

SPATIAL IDENTIFICATION AND LAND USE OF URBAN-RURAL LINKAGE AREA: A CASE STUDY ON BEIJING'S CENTER CITY

POI Based Urban Commercial Centers Identification and Classification

Identification of Urban Clusters Based on Multisource Data—An Example of Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China

Landscape Patterns and Building Functions for Urban Land-Use Classification from Remote Sensing Images at the Block Level: A Case Study of Wuchang District, Wuhan, China

Between Morphology and Function: How Syntactic Centers of the Beijing City Are Defined

Urban Spatial Image Acquisition and Examination Based on Geographic Big Data