Thinking critically about methods when studying cognitive processes and risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Olivia H. Pollak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000171
2024-03-15
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
Abstract:Comments on the article by J. J. Chung et al. (see record 2023-87300-001), a systematic review of the role of cognitive flexibility in self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). Chung and colleagues conclude by providing an excellent set of recommendations to guide future research on cognitive flexibility and SITBs. These recommendations call for specificity in deciding which facets of cognitive flexibility to measure; selection of clinically meaningful "targets" of cognitive flexibility; and consideration of which measurement tools are most appropriate to capture these facets. Context and the state-dependent nature of both cognitive flexibility and SITBs must also be considered. As they explicitly state, these recommendations are largely methodological, and in many ways offer a prescription for clinical psychological science research more broadly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?