CMS Physics: Technical Design Report Volume 1: Detector Performance and Software
GL Bayatian, A Korablev, A Soha, O Sharif, M Chertok, W Mitaroff, F Pauss, V Genchev, M Wensveen, V Lemaitre, V Mishra, M Savina, N Colino, P Petagna, G Landsberg, T Keskinpala, F Nessi-Tedaldi, I Vodopiyanov, S Rahatlou, D Green, A Araujo Trindade, S Singh, P Rosinsky, D Smolin, Y Onel, R Fruehwirth, S Asghar, D Engh, D Winn, F Rondeaux, Marina Giunta, L Foa, B Panev, Y Sirois, T Solaija, M Vergili, E Isiksal, I Churin, A Krokhotin, E Widl, L Feld, HG Wang, T Rodrigo, James Nugent Bellinger, V Elsha, B Lisowski, R Adolphi, C Rott, H Kim, A Colaleo, B De Callatay, A Marinov, I Ahmed, A Singovsky, B Baldin, M Konecki, V Andreev, A Shah, M Albrow, C Almeida, P Busson, N Almeida, D Vintache, M Poettgens, V Zhukov, E Marinova, P Sharp, S Vaurynovich, J Olzem, A Bujak, CH Jiang, A Flossdorf, B Raue, A Dominguez, A Bornheim, P Sphicas, G Roland, MW Lee, A Kayis Topaksu, V Perelygin, N Stanton, A Litomin, F Hartmann, P Raics, E James, S Ganjour, D Futyan, P Zalewski, F Ligabue, G Polese, S Stoykova, M Haguenauer, A Ninane, Wilhelm H Bertl, E Tuominen, YS Chung, F Sikler, M Ignatenko, R Loveless, S Petrushanko, JM Lopez, A Bocci, S Greder, J Blaha, A Marchioro, M Jha, S Akhtar, Y Fu, C Tully, C Ciocca, EA De Wolf, I Lokhtin, M Pieri, MS Kalelkar, A Filine, S Marcellini, S Heising, V Korenkov, P Ingenito, I Diaz Merino, Elizabeth Jane Dusinberre Sudano, P Kreuzer, JC Yun, H Mathez, K Gabathuler, DM Newbold, T Ortega Gomez, M Wlochal, Y Zheng, DJ Karmgard, W Sakumoto, N Demaria, A Petrilli, K Doroba, D Konstantinov, E Torassa, M Friedl, M Planinic, B Perea Solano, N De Filippis, P Gartung, M Schmitt, A Racz, A Lath, F Borcherding, J Amundson, C Civinini, M Zeyrek, A Heister, H Castilla Valdez
2006-01-01
Abstract:Although the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics has so far been tested to exquisite precision, it is considered to be an effective theory up to some scale Λ≈ TeV. The prime motivation of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is to elucidate the nature of electroweak symmetry breaking for which the Higgs mechanism is presumed to be responsible. The experimental study of the Higgs mechanism also can shed light on the mathematical consistency of the SM at energy scales above about 1 TeV. However, there are alternatives that invoke more symmetry such as supersymmetry or invoke new forces or constituents such as strongly-broken electroweak symmetry, technicolour, etc. An as yet unknown mechanism is also possible. Furthermore there are high hopes for discoveries that could pave the way toward a unified theory. These discoveries could take the form of supersymmetry or extra dimensions, the latter often requiring modification of gravity at the TeV scale. Hence there are many compelling reasons to investigate the TeV energy scale. Hadron colliders are well suited to the task of exploring new energy domains, and the region of 1 TeV constituent centre-of-mass energy can be explored if the proton energy and the luminosity are high enough. The beam energy (7 TeV) and the design luminosity (L= 1034 cm− 2 s− 1) of the LHC have been chosen in order to study physics at the TeV energy scale. Hence a wide range of physics is potentially possible with the seven-fold increase in energy and a hundred-fold increase in integrated luminosity over the current hadron collider experiments. These conditions also require a very careful design of the …