Co-benefits of carbon and pollution control policies on air quality and health till 2030 in China

Jinzhao Yang,Yu Zhao,Jing Cao,Chris P Nielsen,Chris P. Nielsen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106482
IF: 11.8
2021-07-01
Environment International
Abstract:<p>Facing the dual challenges of climate change and air pollution, China has made great efforts to explore the co-control strategies for the both. We assessed the benefits of carbon and pollution control policies on air quality and human health, with an integrated framework combining an energy-economic model, an air quality model and a concentration–response model. With a base year 2015, seven combined scenarios were developed for 2030 based on three energy scenarios and three end-of-pipe control ones. Policy-specific benefits were then evaluated, indicated by the reduced emissions, surface concentrations of major pollutants, and premature deaths between scenarios. Compared to the 2030 baseline scenario, the nationwide PM<sub>2.5</sub>- and O<sub>3</sub>-related mortality was expected to decline 23% or 289 (95% confidence interval: 220–360) thousand in the most stringent scenario, and three quarters of the avoided deaths were attributed to the end-of-pipe control measures. Provinces in heavily polluted and densely populated regions would benefit more from carbon and pollution control strategies. The population fractions with PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure under the national air quality standard (35 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) and WHO guideline (10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) would be doubled from 2015 to 2030 (the most stringent scenario), while still very few people would live in areas with the WHO guideline achieved for O<sub>3</sub> (100 μg/m<sup>3</sup>). Increased health impact of O<sub>3</sub> suggested a great significance of joint control of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> in future policy-making.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?