DSG2 Expression is Correlated with Poor Prognosis and Promotes Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Shuhang Qin,Yuandong Liao,Qiqiao Du,Wei Wang,Jiaming Huang,Pan Liu,Chunliang Shang,Tianyu Liu,Meng Xia,Shuzhong Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01292-x
IF: 6.429
2020-01-01
Cancer Cell International
Abstract:Background: The pathogenesis and developmental mechanism of early-stage (FIGO 2009 IA2-IIA2) cervical cancer (CC) remain unclear. Seeking novel molecular biomarkers based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) will facilitate the understanding of CC pathogenesis and help evaluate early-stage CC prognosis. Methods: To identify prognosis-related genes in early-stage CC, we analyzed TCGA mRNA-seq data and clinical data by univariate Cox and Kaplan-Meier plotter analyses. Differential expression analysis identified upregulated genes in early-stage CC. Combined with the genes correlated with unfavorable prognosis, we selected DSG2 for further investigation. To detect DSG2 expression in early-stage CC, we used immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blotting. The relationship between the expression of DSG2 and clinical features was analyzed by the chi-square test. Cox analysis was applied to assess the relationship between CC overall survival (OS) and risk factors. The correlations between DSG2 expression and CC cell line proliferation and migration were investigated with Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and migration assays. Results: There were 416 prognosis-related genes in early-stage CC. DSG2, MMP1, CA9, HOXA1, and SERPINB3 were upregulated in early-stage CC compared with adjacent noncancerous tissue (ANT) and correlated with unfavorable prognosis. Among them, DSG2 was most significantly correlated with patient survival. Coexpression analysis indicated that DSG2 was probably involved in cell division, positive regulation of transferase activity, positive regulation of cell migration, EGFR upregulation pathway and regulation of lymphangiogenesis. IHC, qRT-PCR and western blotting showed that DSG2 expression was higher in CC than in normal tissue. Significant correlations were identified between DSG2 expression and several aggressive clinical features, including pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that DSG2 and PLNM were independent prognostic factors for OS. DSG2 knockdown inhibited CC cell proliferation and migration. Conclusions: DSG2 is a new biomarker that promotes tumor proliferation and metastasis and is correlated with poor prognosis in early-stage CC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?