Abstract:With the development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a new generation of editing methods that convert specific bases has enabled precise single-base mutations. To date, conversion of cytosine to thymidine and adenine to guanine has been achieved using the cytidine deaminase APOBEC1 and adenosine deaminase (TadA), respectively. However, the base editing efficiency can be unacceptably low in some cell types or at certain target loci. One reason might be the lack of a selective pressure against the survival of non-edited cells. Few studies on ABE in prokaryotes have been reported, probably due to the relatively low editing efficiency of TadA. Improving the editing efficiency is the key for establishing base editing techniques and especially the ABE technologies. In this work, a selective pressure against non-edited cells was implemented to increase the base editing efficiency. Firstly, we fused nCas9 or dCas9 with TadA to compare the editing efficiency of nCas9-TadA and dCas9-TadA fusion complexes in the model prokaryote Escherichia coli. While nCas9-TadA was able to achieve A to G base editing (ABE) with a moderate efficiency, dCas9-TadA had a very low efficiency. To enrich for edited cells and increase the base-editing efficiency, we utilized the induction of double-strand breaks by active Cas9, which leads to the death of prokaryotic cells. By introducing an inducible active Cas9 with the same editing gRNA as the nCas9-TadA in the base editing process, the cells with non-edited target bases remained vulnerable to Cas9 and were eliminated. Thus, a double-check base editing (DBE) method was established, which significantly improved the editing efficiency of ABE in E. coli, reaching 99.0% for some sites. By placing a selective pressure against non-edited cells, the DBE strategy might also be applied to various scenarios to increase the efficiency of many different base editing targets or even for epigenetic DNA modification techniques.

Cas12a Base Editors Induce Efficient and Specific Editing with Low DNA Damage Response

Cas9-orthologue-mediated cytosine and adenine base editors recognizing NNAAAA PAM sequences

Eliminating Base-Editor-induced Genome-Wide and Transcriptome-Wide Off-Target Mutations

Precise base editing with CC context-specificity using engineered human APOBEC3G-nCas9 fusions

Multiplexed base editing through Cas12a variant-mediated cytosine and adenine base editors

nCas9 Engineering for Improved Target Interaction Presents an Effective Strategy to Enhance Base Editing

An APOBEC3A-Cas9 Base Editor with Minimized Bystander and Off-Target Activities

Double-Check Base Editing for Efficient A to G Conversions

Improving Editing Efficiency for the Sequences with NGH PAM Using Xcas9-Derived Base Editors.

Cooperativity between Cas9 and hyperactive AID establishes broad and diversifying mutational footprints in base editors

Expanding the Genome-Targeting Scope and the Site Selectivity of High-Precision Base Editors

Efficient and High-Fidelity Base Editor with Expanded PAM Compatibility for Cytidine Dinucleotide

Increasing the Targeting Scope and Efficiency of Base Editing with Proxy‐BE Strategy

Engineering of cytosine base editors with DNA damage minimization and editing scope diversification

Two Compact Cas9 Ortholog-Based Cytosine Base Editors Expand the DNA Targeting Scope and Applications In Vitro and In Vivo

Glycosylase-based Base Editors for Efficient T-to-G and C-to-G Editing in Mammalian Cells

Efficient C-to-G Base Editing with Improved Target Compatibility Using Engineered Deaminase-nCas9 Fusions.

ACBE, a new base editor for simultaneous C-to-T and A-to-G substitutions in mammalian systems

Develop a Compact RNA Base Editor by Fusing ADAR with Engineered EcCas6e

Base Editing with a Cpf1–cytidine Deaminase Fusion

Improved Base Editor for Efficient Editing in GC Contexts in Rabbits with an Optimized AID‐Cas9 Fusion