Abstract:Parenting experts have recommended that parents combine reasoning with firm control strategies (i.e., constraints) when adolescents persistently break rules. By doing so, parents would foster two key socialization goals, namely compliance and internalization. However, recent studies hint that parental constraints could hinder the socialization benefits of parental reasoning, depending on whether they are used as logical consequences (LC) or as mild punishments (MP). Our research tested this possibility across two studies. We recruited early to late adolescents and obtained perceived and coded measurements of their parents’ interventions in rule-breaking situations (i.e., reasoning and constraints) as well as global, situational, and daily indicators of adolescent compliance (i.e., lack of defiance and rule-breaking behaviours) and internalization (i.e., autonomous compliance, controlled compliance, and acceptability beliefs). In Study 1 (N = 437) and Study 2 (N = 65), parental choice of constraint moderated the role of parental reasoning in adolescent autonomous compliance and compliant behaviours. When parents tended to use LC, parental reasoning positively (or nonsignificantly) predicted adolescent autonomous compliance and compliant behaviours. In contrast, when parents tended to use MP, reasoning was less strongly (or nonsignificantly) associated with autonomous compliance and predicted negatively (or nonsignificantly) compliance. Examining the main effects on adolescent acceptability beliefs and controlled compliance revealed limited relations with reasoning. In contrast, constraints with stronger problem-constraint link tended to positively predict acceptability beliefs and negatively predict controlled compliance. These results extend past recommendations to combine parental reasoning with firm control strategies by showing the benefits of favouring LC over MP. Les experts en pratiques parentales recommandent que les parents conjuguent raisonnement et stratégies de contrôle ferme (p.ex., les contraintes) lorsque leurs adolescents enfreignent les règles de façon persistante. Ainsi, les parents encourageraient l’atteinte de deux objectifs clés de socialisation, soit l’obéissance et l’intériorisation. Or, des études récentes suggèrent que les contraintes parentales pourraient affecter le rôle socialisateur du raisonnement, selon si elles sont utilisées sous forme de « conséquences logiques » (CL) ou de « punitions légères » (PL). Cette recherche vise à évaluer cette possibilité à l’aide de deux études. Nous avons recruté des adolecents et obtenu des mesures perçues et codées des interventions de leurs parents dans des situations d’infraction aux règles (c.-à-d., raisonnement et contraintes), ainsi que des indicateurs globaux, situationnels et quotidiens d’obéissance (absence de défiance et de comportements de transgression de règles) et d’intériorisation (obéissance autonome, obéissance contrôlé, et perceptions d’acceptabilité). Dans l’étude 1 (N = 437) et l’étude 2 (N = 65), le type de contrainte parental modérait le rôle du raisonnement parental dans les comportements d’obéissance et d’obéissance autonome de l’adolescent. Chez les parents favorisant les CL, le raisonnement parental présidait positivement (ou de manière non significative) les comportements d’obéissance et d’obéissance autonome. En revanche, chez les parents favorisant les PL, le raisonnement était moins fortement (ou non-significativement) associé à l’engagement autonome, et prédisait négativement (ou non-significativement) l’obéissance. L’examen des effets principaux a révélé des relations limitées entre le raisonnement et l’acceptabilité ainsi que l’obéissance contrôlée. En comparaison, les contraintes présentant un lien problème-contrainte plus fort tendaient à prédire une plus grande acceptabilité et moins d’obéissance contrôlée. Ces résultats mettent en évidence les avantages des CL comparativement aux PL, bonifiant et nuançant ainsi la recommandation de conjuguer le raisonnement aux contraintes parentales.

Can exposure to framed messages about safety reduce risk behaviours by school-age children?

Le développement sain de l’enfant par le jeu risqué extérieur : un équilibre à trouver avec la prévention des blessures

Effectiveness of an injury prevention video on risky behaviours in youth snow sports: A randomized controlled trial

Playing it safe: The relationship between parent attitudes to risk and injury, and children's adventurous play and physical activity

Effective communication with caregivers to prevent unintentional injuries in children under seven years. A systematic review

Améliorer la sécurité à vélo chez les enfants et les adolescents

The Effectiveness of a Home Visit to Prevent Childhood Injury

A pilot randomized trial evaluating the Cool 2 Be Safe Junior Playground Safety Program for preschool children

What children's perspectives on safe and dangerous outdoor play can tell us about their risk-seeking and injury experiences: 'You don't feel right doing the thing that got you hurt'

A Web-Based and In-Person Risk Reframing Intervention to Influence Mothers’ Tolerance for, and Parenting Practices Associated With, Children’s Outdoor Risky Play: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Risky Play and Children’s Safety: Balancing Priorities for Optimal Child Development

Evaluation of a gamified e-learning platform to improve traffic safety among elementary school pupils in Belgium

Investigating social determinants of child health and their implications in reducing pediatric traumatic injury: A framework and 17-year retrospective case-control study protocol

A longitudinal study of parents' home-safety practices to prevent injuries during infancy

A Web-Based and In-Person Risk Reframing Intervention to Influence Mothers’ Tolerance for, and Parenting Practices Associated With, Children’s Outdoor Risky Play: Randomized Controlled Trial

Using the pediatric emergency department to deliver tailored safety messages: results of a randomized controlled trial

‘They installed a speed bump’: children’s perceptions of traffic-calming measures around elementary schools

Should parents combine reasoning with firm control to nurture adolescent socialization? Comparing logical consequences with mild punishments.

Parents’ Attitudes As Mediators Between Knowledge and Behaviours in Unintentional Injuries at Home of Children Aged 0–3 in Shanghai, Eastern China: a Cross-Sectional Study

Change of risk behaviour in young people - the effectiveness of the trauma prevention programme P.A.R.T.Y. considering the effect of fear appeals and cognitive processes

The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma’s Injury Control and Violence Prevention Committee’s annual distracted driving outreach event: Evaluating attitude and behavior change in high school students