Abstract:Exploratory factor analyses are commonly used to determine the underlying factors of multiple observed variables. Many criteria have been suggested to determine how many factors should be retained. In this study, we present an extensive Monte Carlo simulation to investigate the performance of extraction criteria under varying sample sizes, numbers of indicators per factor, loading magnitudes, underlying multivariate distributions of observed variables, as well as how the performance of the extraction criteria are influenced by the presence of cross-loadings and minor factors for unidimensional, orthogonal, and correlated factor models. We compared several variants of traditional parallel analysis (PA), the Kaiser-Guttman Criterion, and sequential χ2 model tests (SMT) with 4 recently suggested methods: revised PA, comparison data (CD), the Hull method, and the Empirical Kaiser Criterion (EKC). No single extraction criterion performed best for every factor model. In unidimensional and orthogonal models, traditional PA, EKC, and Hull consistently displayed high hit rates even in small samples. Models with correlated factors were more challenging, where CD and SMT outperformed other methods, especially for shorter scales. Whereas the presence of cross-loadings generally increased accuracy, non-normality had virtually no effect on most criteria. We suggest researchers use a combination of SMT and either Hull, the EKC, or traditional PA, because the number of factors was almost always correctly retrieved if those methods converged. When the results of this combination rule are inconclusive, traditional PA, CD, and the EKC performed comparatively well. However, disagreement also suggests that factors will be harder to detect, increasing sample size requirements to N ≥ 500. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Selecting the number of factors in multi‐variate time series

Modeling High-Dimensional Time Series: A Factor Model With Dynamically Dependent Factors and Diverging Eigenvalues

A Testing Procedure for Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models With Large Datasets

A Multi-Step Procedure to Determine the Number of Factors in Large Approximate Factor Models

Identifying the Number of Factors from Singular Values of A Large Sample Auto-Covariance Matrix

Eigenvalue tests for the number of latent factors in short panels

A Randomized Sequential Procedure to Determine the Number of Factors

A criterion for the number of factors

Factor Models for Portfolio Selection in Large Dimensions: The Good, the Better and the Ugly

Robust estimation for number of factors in high dimensional factor modeling via Spearman correlation matrix

Factor Strength Estimation in Vector and Matrix Time Series Factor Models

Factor models and variable selection in high-dimensional regression analysis

Identifying Observed Factors in Approximate Factor Models: Estimation and Hypothesis Testing

Time‐Series Factor Modeling and Selection

Time-Varying Matrix Factor Models

Factor Models for Matrix-Valued High-Dimensional Time Series

Transformed contribution ratio test for the number of factors in static approximate factor models

Factor modelling for high-dimensional functional time series

How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions.

Robust Factor Number Specification for Large-Dimensional Elliptical Factor Model.