Transarterial Infusion Chemotherapy with FOLFOX for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Multi-Center Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Real-World Practice.

Shaohua Li,Jie Mei,Qiaoxuan Wang,Feng Shi,Hongyan Liu,Ming Zhao,Lianghe Lu,Yihong Ling,Zhixing Guo,Yabing Guo,Xiaoming Chen,Ming Shi,Wan Yee Lau,Wei,Rongping Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2020.03.14
2021-01-01
HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition
Abstract:BACKGROUND:To compare the treatment effectiveness and safety among transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) with FOLFOX regimen, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and sorafenib in patients with BCLC stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).METHODS:The data of consecutive patients with BCLC stage C HCC treated with TAI, TACE, or sorafenib from January 2015 to December 2018 at three centers were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was pairwise performed to reduce selection bias. Treatment effectiveness and safety were evaluated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox regression models, and χ2 test.RESULTS:The median overall survival (OS) in the matched TAI cohort was significantly longer than the sorafenib cohort (19.6 vs. 7.5 months, P=0.009), and the TACE cohort (estimated 27.8 vs. 6.6 months, P<0.001). The difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between the matched TAI and sorafenib cohorts was not significant (5.8 vs. 2.3 months, P=0.219). The median PFS in the matched TAI cohort was significantly longer than the TACE cohort (6.5 vs. 2.8 months, P<0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) in the matched TAI cohort was significantly higher than the sorafenib cohort (36.4% vs. 0.0%, P<0.001) and the TACE cohort (48.7% vs. 4.7%, P<0.001). The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were similar among these three cohorts.CONCLUSIONS:TAI with FOLFOX regimen was an effective and safe therapy that improved survival of patients with BCLC stage C HCC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?